That's the assumption, but is it a sure thing? Remember when everyone said dickrod was gonna terrorize the B1G when his offenses got the caliber of recruits scUM drew? There's more to coaching at big time programs than simply "schematics." There's culture, interacting with donors/alumni, etc.. Why the defensive assumption? His defenses at Oregon ranged from decent to mediocre, much like dickrod's at wvu. Hell, dickrod fielded better D's at wvu, but couldn't put it together at scUM, a program traditionally known for fielding good defenses.
He very well could build a monster at USC, or he could fall flat on his face when he tries to utilize his system at a program that is vastly different from a "culture" standpoint than Nike U. I just don't see it as a guarantee.
RichRod ran 335 at WVU... scUM refused to hire his DC from WVU to run the 335. Instead he hired 43 guys, then forced them to attempt running 335 anyway... both have had more success since leaving there and running their own defense (43).
It was unlikely 335 would ever work in the Big10... but it was doomed when they refused to hire the DC for it and instead forced 43 coaches to do 335. I can guess there was a serious power struggle behind the scenes over the defense... the University forced him to hire guys to run 43, but couldn't force him to actually implement 43 on the field.
RichRod got his DC from WVU choice back in Arizona, where they do 335.
I don't know what Chip Kelly did at Oregon (34?), but I have a feeling it'd just be Oregon 2.0 ... flashy offense, suspect defense. Tigers don't change their stripes. Still, in today's PAC that'd get the job done. It's done Oregon well enough in recent years...
Upvote
0