HorseshoeFetish
Silver Bullet Supporter
We wore fucking black, BLACK uniforms for those assholes. It's a rivalry. I just puked in my mouth.
I thought we were just being respectful at their funeral.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We wore fucking black, BLACK uniforms for those assholes. It's a rivalry. I just puked in my mouth.
That targeting penalty still bothers me. Sorry if this has already been posted, but in order for it to be "targeting", the receiver needs to be a "defenseless player". The rule book defines the "defenseless player" as, among other things, a receiver who is in the act of catching the ball or hasn't had time to "defend" himself. Basically, once he "makes a football move", he is a runner, not a receiver, and no longer defenseless. So he fumbled the ball after being hit - if he was in the act of "making a football move" still, it would have been ruled an incompletion, but it was ruled a fumble. You can't have it both ways. It's either a fumble and no targeting, or an incompletion and targeting.
Now, I don't know the rule on spearing. Maybe you can call that...
All of that is fine, but the rule was enforced on the "leading with the crown of the helmet", which was indisputable.
I think it's a gray area that they've made black and white for the sake of player safety, and this particular instance wouldn't have been looked at twice 5 years ago...
...but it doesn't change the fact that it was a clear violation of the rule and the penalty and DQ was warranted by the book.
There was no reason for Williams not tackling lower and keeping his head up...none. If you have fairly blatant helmet-to-helmet contact, you gotta flag it. Now, the penalty on Bolden was pure bullshit...but since he's a dick, it's a wash....Agree, it was a penalty by the letter of the rule. However, I don't think it should be a penalty by the spirit of the rule. The point is really to protect guys from being speared or caught defenseless, not to outlaw incidental contact when a tackler ducks his head into a ball carrier that also ducks to brace for impact, or as what happened in the UM/MSU game, a LB being thrown face first by an OL onto a pile.
There was no reason for Williams not tackling lower and keeping his head up...none. If you have fairly blatant helmet-to-helmet contact, you gotta flag it. Now, the penalty on Bolden was pure bull[Mark May]...but since he's a dick, it's a wash....
Agree, it was a penalty by the letter of the rule. However, I don't think it should be a penalty by the spirit of the rule.
Since this rule has been implemented I think it's been fairly enforced about one in four times I see it.
The Buckeyes Play their Best When the Lights are the Brightest
...
.
“I feel like when the bright lights come on we definitely do play at a higher level but we still haven’t played to the best of our ability.”
...
With the new uniforms and the blackout for the fans, did Saturday live up to the extra hype?
“Definitely,” senior defensive tackle Adolphus Washington said. “Went out there in the nice uniforms, the crowd was into it, they were in all black also, so yeah, definitely, it lived up to the hype.”
Entire article: http://theozone.net/Ohio-State/Foot...-their-Best-When-the-Lights-are-the-Brightest