Buckeye86;2348388; said:I think that is exactly what people are worried about right now with some of these underrated players. You claimed that Tressel didn't do that initially but now I guess you are agreeing with me?
I think the "get what we can when we can" attitude represents a huge difference in the way Urban Meyer goes about recruiting.
I don't think saying that Meyer and Tressel are extremely different recruiters takes anything away from the unparalleled success that Tressel had on the field.
We took five OL in the 2011 class. Only one was a 4-star (Bobek) and he committed on Mar 16, 2010, nearly ten months before NLOID. We had three 3-stars (Brown, Carter, Underwood) two of whom committed around the time Bobek did with the other (Carter) commiting after NLOID, and a 2-star (Haynes) who commmited a few days before NLOID. So, the only "early projects" would've been Brown and Underwood. Our OL recruiting was just bad that year. Meyer has two OL so far this class and both are 4-stars, so that's better on paper, and go back again to "Block O" where on paper Tressel absolutely killed it but in the end it didn't pan out anywhere near as expected.
Tressel took his share of 3-stars, but many turned out pretty darn well (Hawk, Holmes, Laurinaitis, Jenkins). Meyer is also taking some 3-stars and taking them early, yet no one is saying he's reaching.
I personally prefer Meyer's approach a bit over Tressel's (get the best talent, regardless of where they'd from vice focusing mainly on locking down Ohio), but I still say overall their approaches are not that dissimilar (wanting kids who want to be Buckeyes, quality personalities in additional to quality talent, and willing to take kids who aren't rated high by the services but in reality are solid talents).
Upvote
0