I kept saying that while the announcers were going on and on about targeting that they weren't reviewing for targeting, they were reviewing it for a fumble. Which it was. I'm not sure what they were thinking with the targeting - what was the defender supposed to do? Not tackle him? I don't give a fuck what they say, the guy was not "defenseless" and he did not lead with the crown of his helmet. JFC. But to their credit the talk turned to changing the rule and Klatt (I think) quietly said it wasn't targeting. So we got that.
Upvote
0