DDN
Logic says BCS' title could be OSU-Michigan rematch
By Marc Katz
Staff Writer
Saturday, November 04, 2006
Some people say if Ohio State and Michigan play a close football game Nov. 18, and both teams are undefeated before kickoff, they should meet again in the Bowl Championship Series title game Jan. 8 in Glendale, Ariz.
Others say only the winner of that Nov. 18 game should go.
I say let 'em play again, and there is some precedent.
In a previous configuration, there was a Bowl Alliance, and in 1996, after No. 1 Florida was knocked off by No. 2 Florida State, 24-21, in the last regular-season game, Florida saved face by beating Alabama, 45-30, in the Southeastern Conference championship game.
Meanwhile, No. 2 Ohio State was upset by Michigan, 13-9, and No. 3 Nebraska was upset by Texas.
Entering the bowl season, the polls ranked undefeated Florida State No. 1, followed by undefeated Arizona State, then one-loss teams Florida and Ohio State.
The Sugar Bowl chose to match Florida and FSU a second time, giving the Gators a chance at revenge, which worked splendidly in a 52-20 thumping of the Seminoles.
Meanwhile, Ohio State had no chance to avenge its gaffe against the Wolverines, but did defeat Arizona State, 20-17, in the Rose Bowl.
I had an Associated Press vote that year and sheepishly figured OSU beating an undefeated team had as much right to No. 1 as a team that went 1-1 against its biggest competitor. Turns out, I was the only voter in the nation who thought so.
Oh, well. The real point here is this: Should all those other pretenders stumble and OSU and UM put on a show for the ages, it would not be unprecedented to ask the two combatants to stage a live Instant Classic.
Here's hoping that happens.
Logic says BCS' title could be OSU-Michigan rematch
By Marc Katz
Staff Writer
Saturday, November 04, 2006
Some people say if Ohio State and Michigan play a close football game Nov. 18, and both teams are undefeated before kickoff, they should meet again in the Bowl Championship Series title game Jan. 8 in Glendale, Ariz.
Others say only the winner of that Nov. 18 game should go.
I say let 'em play again, and there is some precedent.
In a previous configuration, there was a Bowl Alliance, and in 1996, after No. 1 Florida was knocked off by No. 2 Florida State, 24-21, in the last regular-season game, Florida saved face by beating Alabama, 45-30, in the Southeastern Conference championship game.
Meanwhile, No. 2 Ohio State was upset by Michigan, 13-9, and No. 3 Nebraska was upset by Texas.
Entering the bowl season, the polls ranked undefeated Florida State No. 1, followed by undefeated Arizona State, then one-loss teams Florida and Ohio State.
The Sugar Bowl chose to match Florida and FSU a second time, giving the Gators a chance at revenge, which worked splendidly in a 52-20 thumping of the Seminoles.
Meanwhile, Ohio State had no chance to avenge its gaffe against the Wolverines, but did defeat Arizona State, 20-17, in the Rose Bowl.
I had an Associated Press vote that year and sheepishly figured OSU beating an undefeated team had as much right to No. 1 as a team that went 1-1 against its biggest competitor. Turns out, I was the only voter in the nation who thought so.
Oh, well. The real point here is this: Should all those other pretenders stumble and OSU and UM put on a show for the ages, it would not be unprecedented to ask the two combatants to stage a live Instant Classic.
Here's hoping that happens.
Upvote
0