buckeyebri;2077651; said:
A year ago this looked like a team poised to make a run at a NC. What a difference a few individuals and a year make.
1. I agree with you completely.
2. I would actually take it down to 1 player:
Look at each loss Ohio State had, and tell me Ohio State wouldn't have won the game if Pryor had been the quarterback for those games.
Miami 24-6 - Ok, MAYBE they lose this one. Maybe.
Michigan State 10-7 - If you think Pryor wouldn't have led that offense to 14 points BEFORE HALFTIME you're crazy.
Nebraska 34-27 - Ohio State's offense, with Pryor, can hold onto the ball long enough to hold onto the win, after being up 27-6.
Purdue 23-20 (OT) - Yeah, they beat Ohio State 2 years ago with Pryor. But I think he would single-handedly score 21 points, if needed, and they win in regulation.
Penn State (whatever that score was) - Let's just say that they actually can score in the second half with Pryor, and they can win that game.
Michigan (something like 40-34) - 34 points is pretty good. And it's hard to say that Pryor could do better. But I still think he'd do better.
Florida 24-17 - First, they wouldn't be playing Florida had those changes been made. Second, I think Pryor would lead them on 4 touchdown drives.
So.. yeah.. I think 1 player changed a national championship contender (I think Ohio State would have been picked over Alabama - not that Ohio State could beat either Alabama or LSU) into a 7-loss team.