Nutriaitch
Retired Super Hero
billmac91;1019580; said:If I'm reading what you're trying to say accurately, I think you may have misunderstood that statistic.
In head-to-head games against the SEC in the BCS Era (1998-present) the Big 10 is 13-11 against the SEC.
I guess missing out on a BCS game doesn't mean much in accordance with that statistic. I think the point is, head-to-head the Big 10 has more than held its own against the SEC, which you'd never get from listening to the national media.
If I'm pointing out something you already understood, I apologize.
Yep, I misunderstood that one. I took it mean BCS bowl appearances. Thanks for correcting that.
BengalsAndBucks;1019594; said:But it in fact helps your record in the series, because a team that would have otherwise been BCS bound gets bumped down to one of the top non-BCS games, and most of the SEC top non-BCS games are paired up with the Big Ten. Therefore, a better-than-its-bowl-game SEC team plays a Big 10 team that is about equal to its bowl game, and presents an inherent mismatch. I am not saying that this happens regularly, but it has happened and skewed the results, albeit slightly.
Sometimes we get bumped farther than that. In '05, we went into the SEC CG with 1 loss an a (very) outside shot at the MNC game. Uga beat us (pretty handily) and we dropped all the way to the Peach (SEC 5th place team) because the other SEC bowls handed out their invites before the SEC CG.
Upvote
0