BayBuck;2295505; said:
There have been a few disappointing early exits along the way, but sorry, including the last two years in your blanket statement takes it over the top, considering Kentucky and Kansas were #2/4 seeds who made the Final Four and championship game. And only six of anything is a very small sample size.
It's like trying to argue with a rock to try to get Davey to understand he doesn't see the forest for the trees. It's hard to win in the tournament, and almost infinitely fairer to compare coaches based on how far their teams have advanced and how often they have advanced to those levels.
Let's look at a coach who has a large sample size to point out the ludicrous nature of trying to rag on a coach with comparing seeds in the tournament and ignoring the success of the team in advancing. Let's go with Coach K, also known as the winningest coach in college basketball history and apply the "Davey analysis" to his Duke teams.
Number of times Coach K's teams have lost to a lower seed in the tournament (starting with '85): 18
Number of times Coach K's teams have neither lost to a lower seed nor beaten a higher seed: 6
Number of times Coach K's teams haven't lost to a lower seed in the tourney & beat a higher seed: 3
Lost to a lower seeded team in:
1985, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012
Did not lose to a lower seeded team and did not beat a higher seeded team: 1986, 1992, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2010
Did not lose to a lower seeded team and beat a higher seeded team:
1990, 1991, 1994
No tourney appearance: 1995
Obviously Coach K doesn't know how to coach since his teams have only beaten a higher seed without losing to a lower seed 3 times over nearly 30 years. But beating a higher seed without losing to a lower seed is exactly what Matta's OSU team did last year.