SEC (It just means more.. even its losses are wins)

[Tomateaux Quinoa Gumbeaux]

You tell us. That's your conference. We got our own silliness to deal with in BIG Tony P.

Greg Sankey sucks, that’s the abridged version of it.

 

[BuckeyeNation27]

I'm not sure what your beef with me is all of a sudden.

I stand by exactly what I said.
I don't think any player that ever participated in any form of his professional sport should be eligible.

that's my opinion on their eligibility. and I haven't wavered on that.

but my opinion on who should or shouldn't be eligible doesn't fucking matter in the real world because I don't get to make the rules.
but if they ARE eligible, then yes I do expect my team to go after them if they feel they will make the team better.

just like I don't like the transfer rules either.
but I'd be lying through my teeth if I even attempted to say LSU should have avoided Joe Burrow because I don't like the transfer rule.
Burrow actually is a bad example because he was a graduate transfer and not like the current portal bullshit going on everywhere.

No beef with you.....just your stance. And you typed a lot of words here, but didn't answer my question. Answering it will help you understand why you think I have a beef with you.

What would it look like if you were just rationalizing a scummy thing your team was doing because it's your team? The same way Michigan fans have decided it's not really that big of a deal to illegally record the sideline of multiple full games of future opponents in order to build a massive database of their entire playbook....for the purpose of knowing exactly what play is coming as it's being signaled in to the players.

You can see where, to an outside observer, it just looks like you're doing mental gymnastics to justify some shitty thing your team is doing....right? You claim you're against the practice.......but all you're doing is defending the program, no matter what anybody says. How is that different from somebody who ISN'T against the practice, but defending the program no matter what anybody says?

 

[Nutriaitch]

Agreed. Your conference is a fucking mess with a shortage of leadership

i can’t believe the fucking commissioner sat up there and openly admitted (under oath) that he doesn’t even know what the NCAA rule was.

hasn’t even read it.

it’s been out for two full months.
but even ignoring that, he knew he was listed as part of this suit and was going to be called to testify.

how the fuck did you not read it on the plane ride to Baton Rouge?

says he doesn’t want pros in college sports, then says he can’t even define what a pro is.

 

[Tomateaux Quinoa Gumbeaux]

says he doesn’t want pros in college sports, then says he can’t even define what a pro is.

@Thump is that bad?

 

[Nutriaitch]

No beef with you.....just your stance. And you typed a lot of words here, but didn't answer my question. Answering it will help you understand why you think I have a beef with you.

What would it look like if you were just rationalizing a scummy thing your team was doing because it's your team? The same way Michigan fans have decided it's not really that big of a deal to illegally record the sideline of multiple full games of future opponents in order to build a massive database of their entire playbook....for the purpose of knowing exactly what play is coming as it's being signaled in to the players.

You can see where, to an outside observer, it just looks like you're doing mental gymnastics to justify some shitty thing your team is doing....right? You claim you're against the practice.......but all you're doing is defending the program, no matter what anybody says. How is that different from somebody who ISN'T against the practice, but defending the program no matter what anybody says?

if you paid any attention at all, i’ve said point blank i want blanket treatment.

i never once said what LSU is doing is right/wrong/otherwise.
i never once said LSU was squeaky clean. Never said they should/shouldn’t be doing what they’re doing.


just give me an across the board blanket treatment.
either they all are or they all aren’t eligible.

pick one.
stick with it.
and that’s the rule EVERYBODY plays under.

 

[Tomateaux Quinoa Gumbeaux]

No beef with you.....

So this confirms that Nootch is NOT Arthur Smith’s burner account

 

[Jaxbuck]

So this confirms that Nootch is NOT Arthur Smith’s burner account

No way he stays objective about the TE involved if it was.

 

[BuckeyeNation27]

if you paid any attention at all, i’ve said point blank i want blanket treatment.

And if YOU paid any attention at all, I've said what you say about blanket treatment vs how you defend every action they take and paint every move they make with the glowiest of glows tell 2 different stories.

So again.......can you understand how, to an outside observer, somebody who tries as hard as you're trying to make it seem like poor wittle ol LSU are the real victims here....whether you want to say you are against the NFL players coming back to school or not.....your actions are pretty much the same as somebody who wants to win at all costs, right?

i never once said what LSU is doing is right/wrong/otherwise.
i never once said LSU was squeaky clean. Never said they should/shouldn’t be doing what they’re doing.

No, but you've said they're just sitting there innocently waiting for a ruling and just gosh darn it trying to build the best dad gum team they can. After all.....that's the only thing sweet sweet Lane Kiffin can be asked to do, right?

LSU are the aggressors here. LSU is putting up the statue of Liberty outside campus asking for your tired, former NFL, eligibility challenged masses yearning to play football again. In spite of the SEC saying don't do that.