I figured it worked like the SEC. You go there and instantly become ranked, even with 5 losses. You go to the ACC and you instantly suck.To be fair, a lot of bad P5 teams would do better in the current state of the ACC.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I figured it worked like the SEC. You go there and instantly become ranked, even with 5 losses. You go to the ACC and you instantly suck.To be fair, a lot of bad P5 teams would do better in the current state of the ACC.
If y'all haven't watched Foul Play: Paid in Mississippi by SB Nation, you REALLY need to watch it.
They'd still stick 2 loss bama in there and esecpn would make up some 'computer's ranking to justify it.
Nothing really matters it’s an invitational tournament. They could invite a two loss Alabama if they lost two without Tua.Bro - do you even 'Body of Work'??
Nothing really matters it’s an invitational tournament. They could invite a two loss Alabama if they lost two without Tua.
As I sit here in College Station, TX, I've had a thought arise and I figured I would post it here.
Bringing the big analytical guns into this question (but anyone is welcome):
@BB73 @Buckeyeskickbuttocks @DaddyBigBucks
BP members have noted consistently this season that TAMU just continues to be in the polls even when they lose consistently.
So, my question/thought is if anyone knows whether they're poll ratings were this biased when they were in the Big XII?
I don't know how to go back to get pre-season ratings as well as how things progress during the season.
But I'm presuming that when TAMU was in the Big XII, 1) they're preseason ratings were rarely as positive as they have been since going into the SEC and 2) that they maintain presence in the polls more "rigorously" due to being in the SEC.