Oh and I forgot the kid that is rarely mentioned at RB, Jordan Hall, making decisions even harder since he is a good scatback who can thrive in the spread offense and catch the ball out of the backfield. Not sure if he stays at RB or is moved to WR
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
pnuts34;1446620; said:he is a good scatback who can thrive in the spread offense and catch the ball out of the backfield. Not sure if he stays at RB or is moved to WR
cincibuck;1446823; said:Hmmmm, just being devil's advocate here, but seems between Michael Wiley and Beanie we've had a number of "scatbacks" come into the program and not a one of them has been able to do much with this offense. Mo Wells being a prime example. I wonder why that is because we've seen little guys do well at other schools, Ringer and the guy from Northern Illinois come to mind.
Pittman came in at 195 and got up to 210. Wiley was the only small back that lived up too all those rankings and Wiley was a freak his freshman year starting at different games as a WR,CB,RB and doing K.O. returns.MililaniBuckeye;1446839; said:Pittman was scatback sized, with a fullback heart...
Wasn't Wiley the guy who scored more than 1 td in his first game. Or maybe the kid who ran a kick back for a TD and we had like 8 players on the field ?akronbuck;1446846; said:Pittman came in at 195 and got up to 210. Wiley was the only small back that lived up too all those rankings and Wiley was a freak his freshman year starting at different games as a WR,CB,RB and doing K.O. returns.
I'm still not a fan of those small backs but, I hope one of those stand up too all that hype.
Pittman was 5 11 190-195. so all those small backs that came/come in their freshman year were all 5 10 175-180 but, really shorter and 165-175. I know for a fact Wiley was small as hell. I still see him at game day parties and between A.Winfield and Wiley they, just made me laugh. I'm 6 2 225 and I feel like I'm in the N.B.A TALKING TOO THEM . Those 2 STARS made it being small. True STUDS and they loved my comments, ASKING WHAT IF YOU WERE BIGGER ON THE FIELD. :)jwinslow;1446848; said:Pittman was listed at 190 in 04 (and those are usually generous).
If Pittman was 210 in his senior year, I'm Tiger Woods...he's currently listed at 207 (and 5'11") on NFL.com and that's after two years of NFL S&C. He was likely around 200, maybe 205, in his senior year, and at 5'11" that would make him scatback-sized. Mo Wells is only an inch shorter at 5'10" and was listed at 196 going into the 2008 season, and he's the personification of the word scatback.akronbuck;1446846; said:Pittman came in at 195 and got up to 210.
You might have some Tiger in you but, you must be black then:)MililaniBuckeye;1446859; said:If Pittman was 210 in his senior year, I'm Tiger Woods...he's currently listed at 207 (and 5'11") on NFL.com and that's after two years of NFL S&C. He was likely around 200, maybe 205, in his senior year, and at 5'11" that would make him scatback-sized. Mo Wells is only an inch shorter at 5'10" and was listed at 196 going into the 2008 season, and he's the personification of the word scatback.
MililaniBuckeye;1446859; said:Mo Wells is only an inch shorter at 5'10"
OregonBuckeye;1446908; said:If Mo was 5'10" then I'm Tiger Woods. Unless you're including the dreads.