LightningRod
Legend
The offer doesn't surprise me. This case is being fought in the press as well as in the courts. Each side is attempting to get its story out in the media to the potential jurors that its position is the correct position. The defense team is probably trying to mitigate if not eliminate prejudgment interest and cost assessments in case it loses. Good faith offers to settle are taken into account when deciding these matters post verdict.
Addressing the federal court's jurisdiction, RR's lawyers missed the boat on the removal petition. Because the nature of this case does not involve the constitution, laws or treaties of the US, the federal court's jurisdiction is proper only if RR can prove (he bears the burden of proof on this issue) that the lawsuit involves Citizens of a State against Citizens of another State (otherwise known as diversity of citizenship jurisdiction). RR's attorneys did not set forth an affirmative statement in he removal petition that RR was a citizen of Michigan when he was served with process. The other problem with federal jurisdiction in this case is that a State and its alter ego is not considered a Citizen for purposes of determining this diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. There are a few 4th Circuit opinions holding that state universities are alter egos of a state for diversity purposes. I would expect a ruling on this issue in a few weeks, especially if the judge is inclined to remand the case to state court. Judges are like you and me - why do something when we can pass it off to somebody else.
Addressing the federal court's jurisdiction, RR's lawyers missed the boat on the removal petition. Because the nature of this case does not involve the constitution, laws or treaties of the US, the federal court's jurisdiction is proper only if RR can prove (he bears the burden of proof on this issue) that the lawsuit involves Citizens of a State against Citizens of another State (otherwise known as diversity of citizenship jurisdiction). RR's attorneys did not set forth an affirmative statement in he removal petition that RR was a citizen of Michigan when he was served with process. The other problem with federal jurisdiction in this case is that a State and its alter ego is not considered a Citizen for purposes of determining this diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. There are a few 4th Circuit opinions holding that state universities are alter egos of a state for diversity purposes. I would expect a ruling on this issue in a few weeks, especially if the judge is inclined to remand the case to state court. Judges are like you and me - why do something when we can pass it off to somebody else.
Upvote
0