Frankly HTM I'm calling BS on your whole stance that the lawsuit is the only thing about RR with which you take issue - characterizing RR's handling of the same as poor.
You bundle the affidavit together with the contract buy-out lawsuit. That is a mistake, they are completely different matters. The affidavit was taken as part of the investigation by WVU into Magee's racism claim - not in pursuit of evidence pro or con the buy-out suit.
What about this, instead of responding to something that wasn't really asked (when are you tired of RR) instead talk to what is really at issue?
When - aside from the lawsuit - did you hear of, or see reported actions, words, statements about RR that would cause you to question his values or character?
You would have us believe that it didn't happen with this affidavit - barely credible in my view, certainly the statements made are a clear cause for concern.
You would have us believe that you have forgotten or have dismissed the manner in which he exited WVU, about which there was substantial reporting and blogging - why, because I'm so tired of it.
You would have us believe that RR phoning Pryor before his meeting with the WVU administration - truth of which is demonstrated by the original times given in the Scout article about the same - that this means nothing to you, it isn't a red flag. Why? Perhaps that falls under you dismissing out of hand any criticism of RR that emanates from either Columbus or from WVU territory. If so, then it means you are blinkering your view of the new guy in town - it becomes then only about winning at any cost.
The above would be reason enough to call BS. But then there is the little matter of common sense - the matter of contrast old and new - the matter of TSUN holding their standards and head high in the past, and their inability to really do so now. At least not without ignoring all the contrary evidence.
[Cooper analogy.]
Yet you would have us believe that the far worse things surrounding RR are not a cause for you to question his character?
