Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BuckeyeMike80;1707200; said:There's no way he's going to get traded within the Division. In fact, my guess is he'll end up in the American League (White Sox, Angels, BoSox or Tampa would be my guess)....
jlb1705;1707218; said:I know that's probably true, but why should the Astros give a shit? It's not like they're going to be good again soon enough for something like that to matter. In the meantime, they owe Oswalt another $26 million for the remainder of this season and the next one, and in 2012 would need to pay him $2 million to walk of $16 million to stay. Right now they're a more expensive version of the Pittsburgh Pirates.
Jaxbuck;1707223; said:From their point of view they'd be crazy not to play it out until July 31'st to get the most they could for him. He should be the top pitcher available at the deadline.
I honestly think that Harang/Alonzo/couple of B level prospects for Oswalt (and his contract) is a good deal for both teams.
"Roy's contract has a no-trade clause, not a trade-me clause," Wade said. "There is no rule that allows a player in his contract status to demand a trade. So demand, request, hold your breath until you turn blue, it's all the same. It's acknowledged and noted."
Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20....astros.ap/index.html?eref=sihp#ixzz0ocykNWGH
Get a free NFL Team Jacket and Tee with SI Subscription
scott91575;1707241; said:Harang will not be involved in any deal like that. If he is traded, his team option is automatically picked up for 2011. No team want to pay him $12 million+ next year. Harang is untradable.
if traded, 2011 option becomes mutual option at $14M ($2.5M buyout)
jlb1705;1707242; said:COTS says otherwise...
Now, not many teams are going to want to pay him $2.5 million to not pitch for them either. A deal for Oswalt is one of the few scenarios where it would make sense though since even with the buyout they would realize huge savings (15.5 million in salary plus buyout) over what they'd have to pay Oswalt.
jlb1705;1707237; said:According to COTS, Lee does have a "nominal weight clause" in his contract so the only way to get rid of him would be to hope he gets really fucking fat.
Dryden;1707595; said:Per Tim Kirkjian just now on Baseball Tonight: The Reds are 13 games over .500 since the Scott Rolen trade last year. Tim suspects this is not a coincidence.
In a related story, I did not play Scott Rolen on my fantasy team today since it was a day game after a night game, so I presumed he'd be scratched.