BuckeyeNation27;1689375; said:
I read an interesting article this morning about why all the good prospects stay in the minors for so long.
Strasburg's station based on dollars, not sense - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
long story short, don't expect to see Chapman any time soon.
Jax and I covered much of this a couple pages ago, but with Leake instead of Chapman.
First of all, I hate the inflated dollars they use with Lincecum. He is a two time Cy Young award winner. That is the worst case scenario. Second, how do they get those numbers?
The report compared Strasburg as Super 2 and non-Super 2 player, using Lincecum?s projected salaries as baselines: As a Super 2: $9 million in 2013, $14 million in 2014, $18 million in 2015 and $22 million in 2016.
Not as a Super 2: $3.9 million, $9 million, $14 million and $18 million.
That?s $63 million compared to $44.9 million.
No one knows the true value. It's arbitration. Both sides come up with a number and the arbitrator picks the one he deems best. Why is the 2nd year or arbitration under Super 2 different than the first year of a non super 2? That is up to an arbitrator to decide, not some speculation from The Washington Post. The arbitrator won't think "well, since Lincecum just got under the super 2, and this guy didn't I will only match Lincecum's first arbitration." That is not how it will happen. So the savings is more like $7-9 million max (that one year without arbitration), not $18 million. Again, that is WORST case. For most it will be a few million. Not chump change, but not as exaggerated as the press would have you believe.
All that is just addressing the stuff in the article you posted. I talked about a lot of other ways of beating the system earlier. It may be part of the reason Chapman is in the minors, but not the only one. For Strasburg, it is the reason. Yet the Nats know they suck, and might as well get it over with.
Don't get me wrong, teams do play that game. A few million is a few million. Yet the press blows it way out of proportion. It is an issue, and a game teams do play. Yet most of the time it's not saving $10-18 million. It is a few million with most players, and even worst case is no way near the $18 million they are talking about in that article.
Plus with Chapman I not sure how everything works out, but he is not getting league minimum. He is signed to a long term deal already. He is not pitching on a league minimum salary, so the cash difference is not the same and I would have to look into how his deal effects arbitration. Non drafted players like Chapman are a different ballgame than Strasburg, Lincecum, Leake, etc.