BrutusBobcat
Icon and Entertainer
Here's an excerpt from Jeff Amey's always excellent "By The Numbers" column on The Ozone:
Looking at the play selection, that should address fairly clearly whether or not JT "knows" how to utilize Mo Wells. Five out of the seven runs that were called for Mo were types that he's suited to running.
The problem with a draw, of course, is that there's no lead blocker. It relies on selling the pass so that the LBs aren't shooting the gaps. If they are, or if they stay home, or if the OL doesn't tie up the DL, then the back isn't going to get through the hole cleanly and into space. Of course, when set up and executed properly, the draw has great potential for a smaller back who is harder to see and who can make a LB miss once he's past the first level.
Maurice Wells continues to be an enigma to Ohio State fans. He seems to be firmly entrenched as the number two halfback, and Buckeye fans have a hard time understanding why, and would like to see Brandon Saine get more carries. Buckeye fans also seem to be concerned with the number of carries that Maurice seems to get into center of the line when that doesn't seem to be his forte.
Things aren't always what they seem to be, however, and that goes for this situation as well. First and foremost, one of the bigger differences I've seen between Saine and Maurice is in pass blocking. The difference isn't huge, but it does seem that Maurice is better at it. Second, nearly all of Maurice's rushing attempts in this game were on plays that he has been most successful in the past running. He ran only one power play (which he has been unsuccessful running), one stretch play (only slightly better), one sweep and four draw plays (his bread and butter plays). There was no reasonable expectation for him to be unsuccessful on the day. My one gripe with Maurice continues to be that he goes down too easily to first contact.
Looking at the play selection, that should address fairly clearly whether or not JT "knows" how to utilize Mo Wells. Five out of the seven runs that were called for Mo were types that he's suited to running.
The problem with a draw, of course, is that there's no lead blocker. It relies on selling the pass so that the LBs aren't shooting the gaps. If they are, or if they stay home, or if the OL doesn't tie up the DL, then the back isn't going to get through the hole cleanly and into space. Of course, when set up and executed properly, the draw has great potential for a smaller back who is harder to see and who can make a LB miss once he's past the first level.
Upvote
0