SloopyHangOn
WhoO WhoO WhoO!
I've only skimmed the last few pages, but can I sum up that nobody here is willing to or capable of defining "right" or "wrong" in any certain all-inclusive terms? I'm hoping that's the case. We're talking about circumstantial actions, so any "morality" (and I use that term loosely) should be purely circumstantial as well.
That being said, my perspective is that when you break a rule, regardless of who sets it, and the consequences of said broken rule affect anyone else besides you, there's a negative connotation to it. Both men in question here are guilty of that to me. So the only way to really weigh one more or less than the other requires a knowledge of the who and how of each person that has been affected by their actions and since none of us can really put a solid figure on that it comes down to perspective and opinion.
That being said, my perspective is that when you break a rule, regardless of who sets it, and the consequences of said broken rule affect anyone else besides you, there's a negative connotation to it. Both men in question here are guilty of that to me. So the only way to really weigh one more or less than the other requires a knowledge of the who and how of each person that has been affected by their actions and since none of us can really put a solid figure on that it comes down to perspective and opinion.
Upvote
0