• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

QB Troy Smith (2006 Heisman Trophy Winner)

The other paper has a quip which essentially says the same thing. Better to have him serve his suspension now than later. Not sure I buy the learned opinion of the Other Paper's sports staff, but the idea is out there.

Always better to do things as soon as possible... so now if this is the ony game... we'll know what the depth chart (at least as to availabilty) looks like.

Anyway... 27- I think you need to use the sarcasm font more liberally... your, "but he played so well in the Michigan game comment" seems to keep breathing. :wink2:
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeFROMscUM said:
Actually, here's an interesting question I hadn't really considered until now. Would you rather:

1) An untimely phone call last week causes Smith be suspended for a game now and miss the Alamo Bowl
2) He is suspended for the first game of next season instead

While I was worried that perhaps Smith might have lost his shot at the starting spot, i think being suspended now definitely helps his case more than option #2. Now it obviously would have been best had it occured during this season's first game (which it oculd have had we known sooner) while he was sitting out, but anyway.

Just wondered what you guys thought about that opinion. Sorry if it's already been posted and I missed it.


Suspend him now... this way the NCAA knows that the University won't put up with the kind of thing.
 
Upvote 0
I don't know that one game is a proper suspension considering his crimes, I'm just thinking about the fact that it is more Smith-friendly to be suspended now if it does remain as a one game suspension only.

I agree, we need to make an example out of Smith. Not sure if he should be crucified, but he definitely should be punished, and should maybe have to re-earn the starting job next year.

It would send a good message to recruits that we value morals over skills if he had to sit out some next year. We definitely have a shot at a Big10 title, and possibly a national title if we were able to keep that same offense from 11-20 clicking. However without him we might struggle a bit, at least against better defenses. FSU would never keep their QB out of a game for this type of thing. They'd release the info a week after the bowl game, and then have all winter, spring and summer for everyone to forget about it.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeFROMscUM said:
While I was worried that perhaps Smith might have lost his shot at the starting spot, i think being suspended now definitely helps his case more than option #2. Now it obviously would have been best had it occured during this season's first game (which it oculd have had we known sooner) while he was sitting out, but anyway.

Just wondered what you guys thought about that opinion. Sorry if it's already been posted and I missed it.
smith has lost his shot at the starting position. while it is "possible" that smith will work his way back to the top through the course of next season. he will in no way shape and or form be the starter at the begining of the year. what the ncaa has to say about it is largely irrelivant.

tressel strikes me as the type of person who requires his athletes to not only be good on the field. but also in class and in life. if you fail in any of these categories you fail in them all. which is the way it should be imho.

It would send a good message to recruits that we value morals over skills if he had to sit out some next year.
i think it sends the message that we require you to be a well rounded person to survive here just like what is required in the real world. being godlike on the field will not save you if you are inept when it comes to dealing with the real world. no matter how good you are, you can't be protected from your own suicidal tendancies. any parent who cares about their kid will LOVE this. when they send their kid to tOSU they will be sending them to a family environment that will teach them about more than just football and will leave them a better person off the field as well. which is in the end, what sports is about anyway.
 
Upvote 0
smith has lost his shot at the starting position. while it is "possible" that smith will work his way back to the top through the course of next season. he will in no way shape and or form be the starter at the begining of the year. what the ncaa has to say about it is largely irrelivant.

tressel strikes me as the type of person who requires his athletes to not only be good on the field. but also in class and in life. if you fail in any of these categories you fail in them all. which is the way it should be imho.
I disagree with this post. I think a quick review of this year's Michigan game demonstrates pretty clearly who our best QB is. Tressel is no fool; when Troy's punishment is over, he will once again be our #1 QB. IMO.
 
Upvote 0
AJHawkfan said:
IF the penalty is only one game (I believe it will be much more severe), I would prefer it be now. Get it out of the way and go into next season with a (sort of) clean slate.

Why do you think the company attorney waited until now to contact OSU? He was informed of the violation back in the spring. By doing it now, Smith is back before the Texas game, if it is indeed just one game.
 
Upvote 0
Did anybody else notice the part of the article that quoted hearsay from the booster? "Now I own him". What is this supposed to mean? For blackmail? Does anyone else find this scary that a booster would think this or have this motivate him to pay players?

This booster gets no sympathy from me. He's scum. Don't get me wrong, I hope nothing physical happens to this guy, but 44,000+ people died in Asia this week. I'll save my tears for them.
 
Upvote 0
MaxBuck said:
I disagree with this post. I think a quick review of this year's Michigan game demonstrates pretty clearly who our best QB is. Tressel is no fool; when Troy's punishment is over, he will once again be our #1 QB. IMO.
*shrug* i have never met tressel so you could very well be right. but the fact that this was brought to the fore front immediately and dealt with aggressively doesn't (imo) fit with your opinion. though it could be that ag and jt are simply trying to avoid more ncaa problems. though jt doesn't strike me as the "intimidated into action" type. i think jt is doing what he believes to be right regardless of the consiquences. i don't forsee that changing so he can pin a few more w's on his resume.

secondly, i think you are putting way to much emphasis on his performance in "the game". "the game" is so special because it does not conform to known logic. it is a total and complete intangeable. so it is very difficult to measure someones true ability based soley on that game.

assuming ts doesn't loose any practice time because of this, i would be very surprised if he got more than 25% of the reps with the starting O. if this were his first offense i think it would be different. if he were given a real shot at the starting job at the beginning of the year, i think it would be different. but if we win tomorrow regardless of zwick's performance he will once again be the man to beat with boeckman being the #2 qb. smith will need both guys to stumble for him to move up. what i have seen of ts to date does not lead me to believe that he is so much better than zwick or boeckman to jump ahead of either guy on his merits on the practice field alone.

*prays the flame suit he ordered is the right size*
 
Upvote 0
I say we'll worry about who the starting QB is after tommorrow's game, because a lot hinges on Zwick's performance. He has a lot to prove. I've heard too many good things about Boeckman to believe a subpar performance will allow Zwick to be the consensus #1 next year. Smith is an afterthought at this point. Until and unless he is reinstated, he's out of the picture. I really like what he does on the field, and I would have been very pleased with him as our QB the next 2 years, but his off-field conduct has put him in this position, and he must deal with it.
 
Upvote 0
At the risk of becoming the new hate target in football town...

I know "The Booster" personally, as well as most of the others involved in this mess. If his former attorney's accusations are true, then he acted unethically, and should be sanctioned according to whatever guidelines the university has in place. However, despite his chronic bad judgment, he's not evil, and he's not "scum". As for the ominous "Now I own him" quote...I'd be willing to bet this was typically melodramatic self-congratulation, not an indication of sinister plans.

I truly hope that better judgment prevails over those who would threaten physical harm over what is - face it - a game. Get some perspective, would-be thugs.

Without first-hand knowledge of events, I can only guess what's really going on here, but the timing and tone suggest malice and spite on a very personal level. The Booster's former associates - the attorney, as well as the anonymous employees and company officers - clearly aren't going to be satisfied with a simple punitive action - they want him humiliated. Some of their anger is probably justified, but in my humble opinion, they've taken it too far. This is distasteful and sad.
 
Upvote 0
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" width="98%"> <tbody> <tr> <td bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top">
60031_andygeigerTG.JPG

Andy Geiger
</td> <td nowrap="nowrap" width="3">
</td> <td valign="top"> Geiger Verbatim On Smith, Much More
By Steve Helwagen Managing Editor
Date: Dec 28, 2004

OSU athletic director Andy Geiger met with media members Tuesday afternoon to discuss the latest in the Troy Smith suspension situation. He clarified that Smith likely faces a two-game suspension, but could petition to have it reduced to one. He covered a number of topics and this is a must read as he explains many of the things that have and will happen.
</td></tr> <tr> <td colspan="3">
In the wake of the report in The Columbus Dispatch naming a booster who provided <!--Default NodeId For Troy Smith is 1171621,2004-->Troy Smith extra benefits, <!--Default NodeId For Ohio State is 687,2004-->Ohio State athletic director <!--Default NodeId For Andy Geiger is 1322037,2004-->Andy Geiger met with media members. Perhaps the biggest revelation is that Smith’s OSU-imposed suspension would typically fall under the NCAA’s edict of a 20 percent loss of competition. That would normally be two games. In fact, Smith possibly faces a two-game suspension, which would keep him out of the Alamo Bowl as well as the 2005 season opener against <!--Default For Miami is to ignore-->Miami (<!--Default For Ohio is to ignore-->Ohio). But Geiger is hoping for a scenario where OSU petitions for Smith’s reinstatement and the NCAA allows him to return for the 2005 season opener.

Here are excerpts from this afternoon’s press conference with Geiger:

Reporter: What is the process when the university disassociates itself from a booster, as in a case like this?

Geiger: “Well, you write a letter describing what disassociation means. That means no tickets, no attendance at practice, no gifts, any of those kinds of things. There is no relationship. Disassociation is pretty much all inclusive.”

Reporter: At today’s press conference, Coach Tressel affirmed he was acquainted with Mr. Baker. There was no more elaboration from him about that. Have you talked to Coach Tressel about his relationship with this guy? Is it just a passing acquaintance? How would you characterize it?

Geiger: “They are not close. I think it is somebody he has met. I don’t know where Mr. Baker went to school. It was not Ohio State.”

Reporter: How was <!--Default NodeId For Antonio Pittman is 1222984,2004-->Antonio Pittman involved in this?

Geiger: “We talked to the people who reported to us the incident with Troy. Antonio went the first time when he and Troy looked at the possibility of working there, but Antonio did not go back.”

Reporter: Are you going to reexamine the <!--Default For Chris Gamble is to ignore-->Chris Gamble situation with Mr. Baker or Poly-Care?

Geiger: “We’re pretty sure that checked out the way it was supposed to check out, but we’ll take a look at that. She (compliance officer Heather Lyke) went through that pretty thoroughly.”

Reporter: Can you touch on the dilemma you are in as an athletic director. You need boosters to contribute. You may need to do things to encourage boosters to contribute …

Geiger: “They don’t get any closer to our players than the 2,000 people who showed up at City Center to do autographs. Access to the team is clearly arm’s length. What happens with some people is they develop relationships away from practice and away from the university. Those are hard to monitor, the proper relationship.

“If somebody leases a suite in the stadium, one of the provisions in the contract is following and obeying NCAA rules. They are given in the contract what those rules are.”

Reporter: Are you in a tenuous situation where you’re trying to get people to contribute, but you increase the odds of these types of things happening?

Geiger: “I have never been anyplace – ever – where we did not encourage donors to the program, particularly donors who endowed scholarships, to get to know the student-athletes at least on a passing manner. We’re proud of our student-athletes. We don’t put them in a closet and hide them. We’re proud of our donors and almost everybody does it perfectly. They do it exactly right.

“When we get to the point where we have to buy the (prison) building down in Orient and house the team there and let them out for only certain things and transport them … we can’t get there. That’s not what we need to do. I think that we do a pretty thorough job of compliance education. Obviously, we need to make it a mania and have such zeal that everything is completely unmistakable.

“But if somebody is going to deliberately break the rule, I confess to you that I feel defenseless with regard to that. I don’t know how else to say it and that’s the hardest part of this. But the student has responsibility. That’s why the student is not here to play. There has to be accountability on the side of the student and that’s not a mystery.”

Reporter: Is the idea of Troy Smith walking in there and picking up an envelope and walking out, does that make you wonder if there is more credence to what Maurice (Clarett) was talking about with the high-pay, no-work jobs?

Geiger: “I’m not sure that I think that everything Maurice said lacked credence. What wasn’t there was what is there now. We have an example of something that has happened. Do I think it is systemic or widespread? I have no evidence of that. This came to us.”

Reporter: A few years ago, <!--Default For UCLA is to ignore-->UCLA had a running back (DeShawn Foster) who was held out of the last three games after taking extra benefits. I have no idea how his case compares to Troy Smith’s case, but do you have any idea that this could carry over to 2005?

Geiger: “It’s a two-game set. It’s 20 percent of the season. That’s probably what the penalty is. We can probably try to appeal it down, but we haven’t decided if we are going to do that yet. (Two games) is prescribed. The institution declares the student ineligible, then applies to the NCAA for reinstatement.

“He (Smith) needs to make restitution. Then, we have to decide if we will accept the two-game or try to mitigate with the fact he missed the bowl game and the whole trip, we haven’t crossed that bridge yet.”

Reporter: So the 2005 season opener is a possibility, but you have not decided that yet?

Geiger: “Yes, it’s a possibility.”

Reporter: Can you say how much money Troy received?

Geiger: “No, not right now.”

Reporter: Does the amount vary with the penalty?

Geiger: “The amount of money is within the range of the 20 percent (suspension). I think it’s two games. We haven’t decided where to go with it yet.”

Reporter: Whatever penalty he gets, would he be able to practice?

Geiger: “Yes, he would be able to practice (spring and fall) and would keep his scholarship.”

Reporter: Because Mr. Baker has a relationship with the university, does that increase the likelihood of a lack of institutional control?

Geiger: “I don’t think so.”

Reporter: As an athletic director, what is the most frustrating part of this?

Geiger: “Just that we have a pretty active compliance culture. We have four full-time lawyers on staff. They work pretty hard. I think that all of us preach trying to do this the right way. I would have thought that the amount of publiclity over the last two years over benefits and eligibility and non-eligibility and all those kind of things pertaining to a certain student-athlete would have been an incredible education for the student-athlete community and the fans.

“And to have this happen is … very, very frustrating.

“I think there are those who, for whatever reason, want some sort of control or proprietorship or ownership or what have you with regard to a particular student-athlete and the reasons for that are kind scary.

“We jumped on this pretty fast. This is not trifling.

“I think Troy is a good kid who made a mistake and probably had legitimate need and was stretched and stressed. But it’s the top of a slippery and steep slope and I think that we have nipped it.

“Once again, if anybody in the world – within the sound of our voices – misunderstands I would be stunned. But I’ve been stunned before.”

Reporter: Your retirement is pretty close. You’ve made that pretty clear …

Geiger: “I’ll be 66 in March. I’ve been married to that girl (Eleanor) for 42 years and I’m ready for a date.”

Reporter: Will any of this impact when that happens?

Geiger: “No, we’ve got this and we’ve got to get through the basketball stuff that is out there. We’ve got to get through all of that. We’ll work our way through that, but I will reserve the opportunity to step down at some point. I’ve been preaching thist stuff for some time. This is my 11th year at Ohio State. I think we have accomplished a whole lot.

“There comes a time when I think a new voice and a different look is very good for the university. A change could be very good for me. I don’t feel pressure to step down or anything like that. I’m a pretty proud guy. I believe in athletics with all my heart and soul. It’s not taking the easy way to have 35 sports and to push it as hard as we push it. We work hard at it. When it doesn’t go well, it’s hard. It’s frustrating. We just have to be better.

“I don’t think anybody is perfect. I don’t think the guys we’re playing this week – I’m throwing any stones at them – but they don’t have everybody. I read the papers and the transactions and we’re all struggling. I talk to my colleagues and the empathy I hear is, `Oh God, it’s amazing in this world.’ ”

Reporter: I don’t want to misunderstand, but will you stay on and see the whole basketball thing through?

Geiger: “We’ll see how that goes. But again, I don’t want to be pressed on time. I intend to be strong and do a good job right straight through my career. If that means it’s July 30, 2006, (when his contract expires) that’s what I’ll do. If it’s sooner, that’s what I’ll do.”

Reporter: With this latest thing is there any of this that makes you question <!--Default NodeId For Jim Tressel is 1192476,2004-->Jim Tressel’s involvement or is he 100 percent clear in this?

Geiger: “No, I think he’s done well. Guys, we reported, I think the team that went to the first Outback Bowl (in 2000) had a 14 percent graduation rate. I think that was the number. This group is operating with a 53 percent rate. We may have the most Academic All-Big Ten picks. We have more than 40 3.0 GPA guys. We had a pretty good fall quarter academically.

“There are a lot of good things going on in the program, the right messages and the right values – all of those kinds of things … We have had some individual incidents. But the demeanor of the team and the behavior of the team on the bowl trip and those kinds of things is positive, it’s strong, it’s good. Guys are on schedule to graduate.

“Our graduation rate will probably dip a little bit next year with 14 guys drafted to the NFL (last year). They will eventually finish, most of those guys, but not in the time the (NCAA) measures. I’m proud of that and that’s good. That’s to Jim Tressel’s credit.”




</td></tr></tbody> </table>
 
Upvote 0
Onthefringe:

I'd like to reiterate that I do not condone any threats being made to said booster. But I love Ohio State, and many others love Ohio State. As pathetic as it sounds, I very much look forward to autumn Saturdays, as it generally makes my week. So I don't think, as it was put, thatit is simply a "game", as if to demean what this program means to a lot of people and to the state of Ohio. For one booster to think he's above the rest, to take a chance at putting the program in trouble, makes me and a lot of other people justifiably pissed off. I do not feel sympathy for this man. Any humiliation or financial punishment he may recieve as a result of his ridiculous, self-centered conduct is completely justified and well-deserved. I regret that he will feel the wrath of the Buckeye faithful, as a small minority can and will go to extremes, but all of this was/or should have been foreseeable to someone of this booster's intellect.
 
Upvote 0
Obviously, Troy taking the payola from this clown was the wrong thing to do, BUT, what the hell was this Baker guy thinking? I certainly wouldn't personally wish any physical harm on the asshole, but this guy is "fucking" with Ohio State Football, plain and simple. And, in these parts, "fucking" with Ohio State Football just isn't the cool thing to do. I don't know this guys real story, but "Wannabe" seems to be the title I'd bestow upon him. I think he just uses his "seats" to impress people around him, because a true "fan" of this great University would NEVER put a kid in a position to mess-up.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top