4skers89
Yes Man
At least they are asking the right questions, although for the wrong reason. While trying to deflect blame from JoePa to Corbett they are asking a question I've had since the beginning. Any chance Corbett answers it this way? "The investigation was actually finished in 2 years 6 months but we had to wait until JoePa got his record". Weird how a perfect storm of conspiracy theory meets coverup within a football cult might result in the truth coming out.:)
http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=36&tid=156920063&mid=156920063&sid=890&style=2
http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=36&tid=156920063&mid=156920063&sid=890&style=2
1) Based on a decade's worth of evidence of Sandusky's predatory activities, why did it take the Attorney General's Office three years to arrest him? I fully understand that it takes time to conduct an investigation, but as numerous prosecutors have stated, you could have arrested him quickly and continued building the case.
Tragically, it is probable that Sandusky continued to molest victims during your epic investigation, as predators do not stop preying unless forced to do so. Had he been arrested early, (standard procedure in many cases with a lot less evidence), Sandusky would have had to post bail, had restrictions placed upon him, and, most important, been under an ultra-intense media and community spotlight - every minute of every day until his trial.
Upvote
0