I think there will be harsh, but short penalties. One year with out football, probably vacating wins since 1998 or 2001.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
AuTX Buckeye;2182550; said:Fuck donation thats a write off for them. Make it so they cannot claim it as a write off. Also in addition to the forfeiture of the bowl wins, they also need to include the regular season wins from at least 2002
Report of 5 yrs no bowl?
I can live with 2 and loss of a dozen or so schollies.
More than than and I feel truly innocents are being hurt beyond just cause.
* Schools scheduled to play them this season could still do so, I guess, if they wanted to deal with the potential for incredible mayhem. Not sure what else they could figure out, or how you would count those games.
Re: CBS report on sanctions
Exactly correct. They gave all the power to NCAA by sanctioning report and worse yet giving Freeh rein to opine and not just report facts. I am sure every prof who hated the football team creamed them in interviews, giving their opinions too based on little fact.
buckeyesin07;2182579; said:The NCAA has to do something more than a bowl ban and scholarship reductions, unless those are really drastic. Not letting PSU play for at least a year seems appropriate (in addition to other severe penalties) in order to make a statement that people will remember--there was no 2012 PSU team for a reason. The only way I think scholarship reductions and bowl bans would be enough of a penalty is if the bowl ban were for something like 5-10 years and the scholarship reductions were enough to impose a de facto death penalty -- i.e., something like cutting the number of available scholarships in half.
buckeyesin07;2182579; said:The NCAA has to do something more than a bowl ban and scholarship reductions, unless those are really drastic. Not letting PSU play for at least a year seems appropriate (in addition to other severe penalties) in order to make a statement that people will remember--there was no 2012 PSU team for a reason. The only way I think scholarship reductions and bowl bans would be enough of a penalty is if the bowl ban were for something like 5-10 years and the scholarship reductions were enough to impose a de facto death penalty -- i.e., something like cutting the number of available scholarships in half.
ORD_Buckeye;2182528; said:No way could that be anyone but Luberano. Publicly, calling the university presidents "pansies" is a sure way to build up their support within the AAU.