Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I just glanced at the first several posts there. What is the "truth" that those guys think McQueary is going to unleash if the Board of Trustees (or whoever) doesn't pay him off? I know the overall truth they're looking for is "Paterno was blameless", but is there something specific they think McQueary can reveal that will substantially change anyone's view on this? Something like, "I didn't actually see anything, there was no rape, and please prosecute me for perjury"?Pretty obvious that McAndrew is in the free jerry camp.
https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/more-hush-money-will-be-paid.150125/
Isn't it strange how penalties against good teams turn out to be meaningless as they crush opponents while penalties against bad teams change the momentum of the game according to their whiney cult fans?Maybe, but certainly you know that the refs have long attempted to cover their tracks by calling meaningless penalties on Ohio State and Michigan in situations where it won't hurt them too bad all so that they can completely shift momentum and alter the outcome of the game against Penn State's at key moments. And they would have gotten away with it if it weren't for the tireless work on bwi.
I just glanced at the first several posts there. What is the "truth" that those guys think McQueary is going to unleash if the Board of Trustees (or whoever) doesn't pay him off? I know the overall truth they're looking for is "Paterno was blameless", but is there something specific they think McQueary can reveal that will substantially change anyone's view on this? Something like, "I didn't actually see anything, there was no rape, and please prosecute me for perjury"?
None of this would have happened if Joesus had told his followers that they should all eat a bullet for the furtherance of the grand experiment.
Wait, there is a "free Jerry" camp?
I've never got the "no child abuse/pedophilia ever happened" stance, not even one bit
Why would they make up a whole scandal involving Sandusky? Just to "destroy" the Penn State football program? Highly Doubtful, at least in a non cult members mind. Even Jerry admits he was showering and "horsing around" nude with young boys and had to double think the "Are you sexually attracted to underage boys?" question by Bob Costas, surely any person not sexually attracted to young boys would answer a distinct "no".
Basically how do you even begin to defend a strange old man showering with random young boys?
Can we talk for a minute about calling your coaching stint "the grand experiment"? How fucked up is that?
Be a cool nickname for your johnson tho