You still have to mouth cult nonsense for at least 200 posts before they'll feel comfortable with you, and I'm not sure that'll do it post-TugSpeedwell if you start disagreeing with the echoes. And set up a fake gmail account that traces back to another fake gmail account. Considering that McAndrew has no problem posting the home addresses and telephone numbers of Big Ten refs, your e-mail address will not remain confidential if you really piss off the cult.
What is funny is that they'll ban a newcomer for not being a cultist almost immediately, but they have no problem with that batch of newcomers who, I have a feeling, might be actual pedophiles. Essentially, most of the cult is rooting openly (or quietly) for Sandusky's innocence as a means to an end--it would absolve Joesus of wrongdoing and bring back his legacy, success with honor, grand experiment bull[Mark May] and the statute would go back up. There's a small batch of newcomers, though, who clearly view arguing Sandusky's innocence as an end in itself rather than something to serve the cause of Joesus. These are the really creepy ones that have started to show up on there, and I don't believe they're trolls. Whatever crazy cult nonsense Tug Speedwell mouthed, I could never in a million years have written crap about "being touchy with boys but knowing boundries" and argued that soap battles were just "bad judgment." We know that Todd Brewster is a real person, and I bet the rest are too.