HorseshoeFetish;2114749; said:Personally I think it should be much worse. Tats don't give you a competitive edge..recruiting does.
I know this is the company line, and I use it myself when off this board. But, we didn't get penalized for allowing our players to get tattooed. Our players traded on the benefits of being on the OSU football team. Such a practice, when not properly monitored, can lead to a competitive advantage.
Our coach lied about his knowledge of NCAA violations.
That said, We were going to go on being OSU regardless of extra benefits. Oregon is only Oregon because of extra benefits. (I speak of Knight, not Lyles.)
Upvote
0