Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
ysubuck;1952500; said:Yep.
I've heard nothing about Oregon OR North Carolina on ESPIN.
ESPIN did report on Kalis de-committing though.
ochre;1952603; said:Clearly, we need Victoria's Secret to start advertising more on ESPN.
BB73;1947823; said:Clearly college football needs to have a ton of Victoria's Secret ads, for multiple reasons.
Posted by Brooks on Jul. 12, 2011, 3:14pm
During an appearance on Portland radio today, former Oregon head football coach Mike Bellotti defended his hand-picked successor to take over the Ducks program.
(Kelly ex-boss, benefactor: ?Chip said he?s done nothing wrong. I believe him?)At a charity golf tournament in Bend, Oregon, Bellotti was asked by 750 The Game host Jay Allen about the current NCAA investigation into the Oregon football program?s recruiting practices. In response, the former Ducks coach said that he believed Kelly had done nothing wrong but that the UO program would eventually be hit by some manner of NCAA sanctions.
From the 750 The Game interview today:
Jay Allen: ?You ran a very tight ship at Oregon and now the NCAA is taking a look at some things. Have you talked to Chip? What?s your take on what?s going on with that [NCAA investigation]??
Mike Bellotti: ?I have talked to Chip and I feel it?s more probably a bad business deal than a bad choice about how they do business. Chip feels that he?s done nothing wrong and I believe him in that regard. I don?t know what?s gone down with [Houston-based recruiting service operator] Will Lyles and all that.
Cont...
osugrad21;1952913; said:
ysubuck;1952500; said:Yep.
I've heard nothing about Oregon OR North Carolina on ESPIN.
ESPIN did report on Kalis de-committing though.
pnuts34;1953219; said:I personally don't think there's a witchunt against tOSU. UNC and Oregon just don't compare historically with our football team, so the nation won't really care. We're a far bigger story than those schools ever will be. I feel kind of flattered that ESPN put so much coverage on us, it will only show in the end that our sanctions won't be that bad, and if they are, our school will rebound twice as hard after they're through. This scenario would be like if Alabama or Oklahoma were sanctioned the same time as Boise State and Texam A & M. Few people would care about BSU or TAMU. If Oregon is sanctioned heavily though, they're screwed, they don't consistently bring in the top flight talent that tOSU does, and they don't have a home state that produces top talent either, unlike OH. Convincing OOS kids(mainly CA kids) to come there when they're under sanctions will be quite tough, and it may be equally tough to keep snagging top kids from TX as well with Lyles pointing fingers
pnuts34;1953219; said:I personally don't think there's a witchunt against tOSU. UNC and Oregon just don't compare historically with our football team, so the nation won't really care. We're a far bigger story than those schools ever will be. I feel kind of flattered that ESPN put so much coverage on us, it will only show in the end that our sanctions won't be that bad, and if they are, our school will rebound twice as hard after they're through. This scenario would be like if Alabama or Oklahoma were sanctioned the same time as Boise State and Texam A & M. Few people would care about BSU or TAMU. If Oregon is sanctioned heavily though, they're screwed, they don't consistently bring in the top flight talent that tOSU does, and they don't have a home state that produces top talent either, unlike OH. Convincing OOS kids(mainly CA kids) to come there when they're under sanctions will be quite tough, and it may be equally tough to keep snagging top kids from TX as well with Lyles pointing fingers
LSU received 32 DVDs of game and player highlight film for the $6,000 it paid Houston-based talent scout Willie Lyles for his "2010 JUCO perState Package," again raising the question of what Oregon received for its $25,000 payment to Lyles.
LSU released copies of the DVDs to The Oregonian on Thursday in response to a request under open-records law. As promised in Lyles' invoice, the videos included film of California and Kansas junior college players from the 2010-11 recruiting year.
LSU's transaction contrasts with Oregon's exchange with Lyles, in which the Ducks paid him $25,000 in 2010 for game and highlight film from 22 states but could not locate any cache of video from Lyles when asked for it by media outlets. The sole exception, included in a release of documents from UO last month, was a YouTube link, now dead, that Lyles emailed to an Oregon employee in January.
Oregon did receive video from Lyles, Oregon spokesman Dave Williford said Thursday. But Williford said he could not characterize how much video the Ducks received or in what format, or say whether the Ducks received anything other than the YouTube link. Video was the only item mentioned in Lyles' Feb. 22, 2010, invoice to Oregon.
If Lyles sent DVDs to Oregon as he did to LSU, it's not clear why the Ducks do not have them. Oregon's state records law generally requires institutions to retain records about recruitment of athletes for five years or until the end of an athlete's eligibility, whichever is longer.
cont.
Nothing to see here. They paid $25,000 for a youtube link. Sounds legit.muffler dragon;1954313; said:http://www.oregonlive.com/ducks/index.ssf/2011/07/willie_lyles_update_lsu_receiv.html
Not that it's particularly important, but I thought I would point out that the Register-Guard in Eugene has been rather lenient/lazy in its reporting on this. It's fascinating how much of a difference there is between the local paper reporting out here versus what you guys see the Dispatch doing to the Buckeyes. I would actually go so far as saying that the collective sphincter pinching going on out here is a long held breath hoping that nothing comes of the allegations.