LitlBuck;2079653; said:I was just about to ask why the difference between the national and regional ranking. I guess you answered that question
Actually I didn't answer it but the variance between regional and ITA rankings is the difference between a poll/survey of the regional tennis gurus and ITA computer generated rankings.
Regional rankings are probably more predictable, they are derived from a poll of the Midwest coaches et.al. who rank players based on what they have seen, their past performance projected for the upcoming season.
The January ITA national rankings are derived by a computer formula based on the performance of athletes during the abbreviated fall schedule.
There is quite the fuss at USC because last year's NCAA single's champion Steve Johnson was not included among the ITA top 125. Johnson skipped the fall NCAA season to concentrate on the pro satellite tour.
Except for conversation, the preseason tennis rankings are essentially meaningless. As the Winter/Spring seasons progress, the rankings evolve with competition, and they become the basis for seeding in tournament draws.
Upvote
0