• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Ohio State 67 Mich St. 78 (Final)

We are really watching the difference between a well-coached team and a not-so-well-coached team. Michigan State is and always has been a great rebounding team under Izzo. His players get in position and work hard for the rebounds. Ohio State (probably because of the weak zone) is never in position. And the players aren't fighting for the ball at all.

MSU is also moving the ball really well in the second half, and Lucas is unconscious with the one-handed floater.
 
Upvote 0
It hurts to currently have only one guy who can really get to the rim off the dribble consistently. We talk about all the talent that has departed over the last couple years, but man this team would kill for just a Brian Brown or Brent Darby.
 
Upvote 0
OH10;1390360; said:
We are really watching the difference between a well-coached team and a not-so-well-coached team. Michigan State is and always has been a great rebounding team under Izzo. His players get in position and work hard for the rebounds. Ohio State (probably because of the weak zone) is never in position. And the players aren't fighting for the ball at all.

MSU is also moving the ball really well in the second half, and Lucas is unconscious with the one-handed floater.

Holes everywhere in the zone on rebounds. Zones are hard to rebound out of anyway, but the guys have to improve their hands and hustle. It seems that we got beat to every ball in the second half.

Maybe the guys are tired because of depth. I don't know. But watching MSU get 3 shots to our one is disgusting.

Lack of leadership really hurts us when we get down as well. Evan tries to do it all and the guys in general seem to panic. I keep reminding myself we're just young...
 
Upvote 0
OH10;1390360; said:
We are really watching the difference between a well-coached team and a not-so-well-coached team. Michigan State is and always has been a great rebounding team under Izzo. His players get in position and work hard for the rebounds. Ohio State (probably because of the weak zone) is never in position. And the players aren't fighting for the ball at all.

MSU is also moving the ball really well in the second half, and Lucas is unconscious with the one-handed floater.


It also helps to have the players. Lucas was the difference down the stretch in my view. He started to get that look in his eyes..I think he would have taken it over if the game was really close at the end anyway. Put him on tOSU and that game is more of a pickem even though they have greater coaching, depth and just as much talent.
 
Upvote 0
A seven player rotation and no true PG is making it difficult for us to compete for 40 minutes against top teams in the Big Ten.

We can talk about zones, or whatever else, but a young, seven man rotation with no floor leader is bound to have some struggles. Sparty went ten deep today, and wore us down.

Lighty's injury and Crater's stupidity have definitely hurt this team. :(
 
Upvote 0
A seven player rotation and no true PG is making it difficult for us to compete for 40 minutes against top teams in the Big Ten.

We can talk about zones, or whatever else, but a young, seven man rotation with no floor leader is bound to have some struggles. Sparty went ten deep today, and wore us down.

Lighty's injury and Crater's stupidity have definitely hurt this team. :(
Good summary right there.
 
Upvote 0
southcampus;1390351; said:
I think our defense needs some adjustments. Whether it's basics like closing out better or boxing out or just flat out changing out of the 2-3 every now and then. It is ridiculous.

Unfortunately....if he hasn't switched out of it in the past 1.5 seasons, it aint gonna happen. I just hate it when mullens or lauderdale has to close out on a 3 point shooter and leaves the middle wide open for offensive rebounds.

it is a 3-2 zone though not a 2-3. a 2-3 might help our rebounding a little bit since mullens or Lauderdale wouldn't have to leave the paint on D....but then we would prolly give up more open 3's from the wings.

A zone defense in the big 10 is really a lose lose situation. Two many good coaches in this league to think a junk defense will win consistently. We won in years past with solid do and an above average offense. Now we have a below average offense and a decent defense that count rebound. I really don 't know what to say. Just a poor performance in the second half by all scarlet and grey parties involved (including the crowd).
 
Upvote 0
cant expect to win when you get ABUSED on the offensive glass

and on the glass in general, 35-19 MSU in Total rebounds and 16-3 MSU in offensive rebounds, ridiculous

19-4 MSU in second chance points

what once looked like a promising season is now turning into just another average season

looks like the NIT again............
 
Upvote 0
I have said this before this season but it bears repeating. A zone defense is very difficult to rebound out of because no one has a designated man to box out. Once again our lack of defensive rebounding killed us. Also, when we had position, we weren't tough enough in holding it. There were a few times that may be some over the back fouls should have been called but we still were not tough enough.

When our biggest player on the court has to run out to the corner and even hurts the defensive rebounding even more.

I do not think that the return of Lighty is going to help our defensive rebounding that much just because he will be part of the zone defense as well. In addition, his return will probably take away from some of our outside shooting.

I do not have any problem with Simmons at PG. Maybe he doesn't penetrate as much as a natural PG but he really does not turn the ball over that much and is pretty effective from the outside.

This team needs to get much tougher and more aggressive to rebound out of that zone defense.
 
Upvote 0
buckeyemania11;1390391; said:
cant expect to win when you get ABUSED on the offensive glass

and on the glass in general, 35-19 MSU in Total rebounds and 16-3 MSU in offensive rebounds, ridiculous

19-4 MSU in second chance points

what once looked like a promising season is now turning into just another average season

looks like the NIT again............

I agree with the first half of the post

Completely disagree with the latter part.

OSU went 10-1 in a tough out-of-conference schedule. The Bucks will probably find themselves around 4-5 in the Big Ten standings. They're a shoe-in for March Madness, barring a complete meltdown.

Just my opinion. Go Bucks!
 
Upvote 0
OHSportsFan9;1390427; said:
I agree with the first half of the post

Completely disagree with the latter part.

OSU went 10-1 in a tough out-of-conference schedule. The Bucks will probably find themselves around 4-5 in the Big Ten standings. They're a shoe-in for March Madness, barring a complete meltdown.

Just my opinion. Go Bucks!
I don't know if you were addressing my post or not and I'm not sure where you split my post. If you are satisfied with fifth-place in the Big 10 then we are okay and I never said where we would finish but I would agree with that. However, we need to get better if we are going to win any games in the tournament. Getting better means getting tougher and rebounding.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
LitlBuck;1390429; said:
I don't know if you were addressing my post or not and I'm not sure where you split my post. If you are satisfied with fifth-place in the Big 10 then we are okay and I never said where we would finish but I would agree with that. However, we need to get better if we are going to win any games in the tournament. Getting better means getting tougher and rebounding.
I don't think any one is satisfied with a middle of the road finish in the b10. but considering the youth of this team all I look for is their growth as a team. I thought they played extremely well today for the first 15 min or so, after that they look tired on D and didn't get out on the 3 balls which is how Sparty came back.
Hopefully we won't lose people and they will come back next year because we just aren't going to improve as a team much until that happens.
No one can expect Matta to recruit a top four team year in and year out.
 
Upvote 0
Best Buckeye;1390438; said:
No one can expect Matta to recruit a top four team year in and year out.
You're absolutely right. But I can ask him to coach the team such that it isn't outrebounded 2-to-1 by a team that is neither taller nor more athletic.

Not sure what happened to my earlier post, as I didn't slam either players nor coaches. I simply said our execution on the glass was miserable, and that the team exhibited no evidence of toughness. In sharp contrast to the O'Brien teams of the recent past.

I'm not calling out either players or coaching staff, but the last two seasons have been difficult for me to watch (and this one was fine till Dave Lighty departed).
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top