BuckeyeMafia
A Leaf on the Wind
If we only win 2 games this year, I want this to be the second.
Shut the fuck up, ESPN.
Shut the fuck up, ESPN.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
RhodeIslandBuck;1112711; said:If USC's QB can stay poised and calm, the USC receivers are too good not to get open atleast a few times, so the QB will find them.
muffler dragon;1113326; said:If I'm not mistaken, the SC receivers were considered a liability for much of the year. What makes you think they'll improve that much this upcoming year?
Hell, they don't have SEC speed!
methomps;1113805; said:We do have SEC speed! Damien Williams came over with Mustain from Arkansas. He'll be eligible this year, and all the reports I've seen have been extremely positive. Throw in that leading receiver Vidal Hazelton played last season with two torn stomach muscles, Ronald Johnson showed promise as a deep threat his freshman year, and the entire group is a year more experienced, and it would really be baffling if this group didn't have a much improved 2008.
Now, will all that be evident the second game of the season with a new signal caller and no more Fred Davis? Open for debate.
4. USC and its talent
With the possible exception of LSU, who has two national titles in the last four years, every program in America would take USC's success and record over the last six seasons. But for all the hype and all the hosannas heaped upon the Trojans, there has only been one unbeaten season under Carroll, one real national title that didn't need an explanation, and two straight two-loss seasons despite fielding a who's who of superstar high school talent. While USC has a reputation for being a factory for pro prospects, and pro timing day has become legendary, it's not like the Trojans are living up to the hype at the next level. For every Lofa Tatupu there are several Dwayne Jarretts. Reggie Bush has had more success with Kim Kardashian than he has on the field, Matt Leinart thinks he's Vincent Chase, and very soon, USC prospects aren't going to get the benefit of the doubt from all the scouts. The point? Don't just assume USC should be the No. 1 team in the nation just because it's USC.
Cont'd ...
muffler dragon;1113990; said:Hey methomps:
Am I mistaken in remembering that the "liability" on the part of the receivers was their ability to catch the ball? I would imagine that it will be a cold day in hell when SC doesn't have receivers with athletic ability, but catching the ball is the key. If I am remembering correctly; then was it a lack of chemistry with Booty (and Sanchez for his short stint) or something else? Don't get me wrong as I do also recall their youth, but even youth can put two mits on the ball with regularity.
NightmaresDad;1117641; said:I think this series may emulate the series with Texas, in that the road team wins both games.
I hope the USC players underestimate our Defense as much as their fans are doing.
We have three killer road games this year: at USC, at Wisky, and at IL.
If we win all those, the damn media had better respect it and give us credit for doing it.
I wouldn't think it's very difficult to predict who will be starting for OSU in the vast majority of cases.Taosman;1118346; said:SC in the Shoe is probably too far out to predict who we will have starting and who SC will have. The game is too far out to predict, period.