ScarletInMyVeins said:
Dryden... what is the probability that we would have to upgrade some componet(s) of that machine in the near future? Or do you believe that will easily handle anything we can throw at it? BTW I have no knowledge of this crap so your post might as well have been written in japanese, except for the price part
For the foreseeable future, slim to none.
The disk setup information that Clarity posted shows that 74Gb would double the current capacity of BP. With 4 hard drives in a RAID-5 array (3 active + 1 hot spare), 2 of the 4 hard drives could go down and the system would still chug along at 100% availability.
I think 4Gb of RAM is more than enough -- in fact even that might be too much. I'd have to do some reading up on MySQL and vBulletin, but unless I'm mistaken the board software system can't address a single table larger than 2Gb. I've chosen to use 4-1Gb RAM chips rather than 2-2Gb, which is drastically cheaper, but there are still 4 slots available, so the RAM could be upgraded to 8Gb/12Gb easily.
The front of the case similarly has 8 hard drive bays, with only 4 in use, so as the need arises it would be relatively cheap to throw in another 148Gb of hard disks. That even presumes using the el-cheap-o low capacity 37Gb drives (as opposed to 74Gb drives).
If we run out of disk space, we could always just delete the hot chick thread too.
Oh, regarding the system memory ... since the 4Gb set runs $1150, expanding to 8Gb (forgot about the stats engine) would put the system price tag right around $5200. However, we would lose the ability to expand RAM later without pulling existing RAM and selling it at a loss to recoup the investment.
The problem here with the memory purchase (and Intel's architecture) is that the 8 memory modules can only be used when using something called 'single-rank' RAM. Only 4 memory modules are available when using what's called 'dual-rank' RAM (the system bus speed is cut in half since the memory requires twice as much bandwidth for I/O).
1-Gb modules are almost always single-rank.
2-Gb modules are (right now) almost exclusively dual-rank.
e.g. The motherboard
could support 16Gb of memory ... when that particular type of memory eventually costs less than 4-figures per module.
Regardless, I think Brutus and I are both in agreement that 4Gb is plenty, so debating anything beyond that is pretty much moot.