Pursuant to NCAA Bylaw 19.7.1, the NCAA enforcement staff has identified the following potential aggravating and mitigating factors a hearing panel of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions may consider.
1. Institution:
a. Aggravating factors. [NCAA Bylaw 19.9.3]
(1) Multiple Level I violations. [Bylaw 19.9.3-(a)]
x The notice of allegations includes multiple Level I violations involving unethical conduct, extra benefits and a lack of institutional control.
(2) A history of Level I, Level II or major violations by the institution, sport program(s) or involved individual. [Bylaw 19.9.3-(b)] They include:
x March 12, 2012 – Violations of NCAA legislation regarding academic fraud, impermissible benefits, impermissible participation, unethical conduct, failure to monitor, preferential treatment, failure to cooperate and failure to report outside income.
x January 10, 1961 – Violations of NCAA legislation involving improper entertainment and lodging and improper recruiting entertainment.
(3) Lack of institutional control. [Bylaw 19.9.3-(c)]
x As described in Allegation No. 5, the institution demonstrated a lack of institutional control by providing impermissible academic extra benefits to student-athletes, exploiting the anomalous courses provided by the African and Afro-American Studies (AFRI/AFAM) department and failing to adequately monitor the activities of Jan Boxill (Boxill), then philosophy instructor, director of the Parr Center for Ethics, women's basketball athletics academic counselor in the Academic Support Program for StudentAthletes and chair of the faculty.