• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread Nebraska at tOSU, Sat. Oct. 26, 12pm ET, FOX

Believe what you want about the magical properties of bOdY LaNgUaGe, but stop telling me I'm straw manning you when I'm just using a comparison.
Stop telling you? Not happening. Your argument was a straw man, as in you attempted to imply I meant it is how teams are ranked. Nothing I said had a thing to do with team rankings.
Body language argument::a bunch of nonsense that has nothing to do with skill, scheme, or coaching
You're wrong and straw manning yet again. No one is arguing body language says there isn't skill, scheme, coaching. That has nada to do with morale and poor body language.
ESPN Power Index::a bunch of nonsense that is all based on recruit rankings and ignores things like results on the field
More nonsense, more straw, and more non sequitur.
 
Upvote 0
Special Teams - they really need to find a kicker who can be consistent from 40+. The art of kicking has evolved to where 50+ is becoming more regular in the college game. Punting was better yesterday - statistically the best of the season so far - and being able to flip the field was very important. Returns were ok but nothing spectacular.

After the JT years, its been really hard not watching OSU have a solid kicker - when nuuuuge when on the field you banked those 3 points without blinking
 
Upvote 0
For the love of Jeff.... I'm pretty pissed about the targeting call now. I mean, I guess it's better that we get him back for the first half of the Penn State game, but that play would have won the game a little earlier.

Which brings me to my point... Hypothetical: Nebraska COULD HAVE driven down the field and scored a game-winning touchdown after that. Then, if the Big Ten announces that it shouldn't have been targeting, we have to assume the catch was still made, and then the fumble happened, and Ohio State got a clear recovery. So that miracle game that Nebraska fans just witnessed... they'd have to admit it was a sham, right?

If your team won on a controversial play that went your way on the field, and then was later reviewed and the referees or league or someone apologized and said it was a mistake, do you celebrate that big comeback win?
 
Upvote 0
For the love of Jeff.... I'm pretty pissed about the targeting call now. I mean, I guess it's better that we get him back for the first half of the Penn State game, but that play would have won the game a little earlier.

Which brings me to my point... Hypothetical: Nebraska COULD HAVE driven down the field and scored a game-winning touchdown after that. Then, if the Big Ten announces that it shouldn't have been targeting, we have to assume the catch was still made, and then the fumble happened, and Ohio State got a clear recovery. So that miracle game that Nebraska fans just witnessed... they'd have to admit it was a sham, right?

If your team won on a controversial play that went your way on the field, and then was later reviewed and the referees or league or someone apologized and said it was a mistake, do you celebrate that big comeback win?
Just happened after the Oregon debacle…
 
Upvote 0

“During Nebraska’s final drive of the first half, on second down with two yards to gain on the Ohio State 39-yard line, the ball was incorrectly spotted after a run by Cornhuskers RB Emmett Johnson,” the statement read. “The ball carrier crossed the 37-yard line and a first down should have been awarded to Nebraska. “Replay should have stopped the game to review the spot since it involved the line-to-gain.”


This officiating crew needs to find their way to the MAC.
 
Upvote 0

“During Nebraska’s final drive of the first half, on second down with two yards to gain on the Ohio State 39-yard line, the ball was incorrectly spotted after a run by Cornhuskers RB Emmett Johnson,” the statement read. “The ball carrier crossed the 37-yard line and a first down should have been awarded to Nebraska. “Replay should have stopped the game to review the spot since it involved the line-to-gain.”


This officiating crew needs to find their way to the MAC.
That was next level bonkers. The announcers wondered if maybe the linesman got confused as to who had the ball, because there was a weird skirmish away from the play between an OL and a DL. Which......ok that explains why you marked the ball where you marked it, but now we need to have a conversation on HOW THE FUCK DO YOU GET CONFUSED AS TO WHO HAD THE BALL?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top