• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.
Sorry if you missed it, but my post was in reference to #1 seeds, not in reference to seeding in general. By all means, reread.

Sorry if you missed it, but you made a comment about a team being overseeded and I replied in kind. By all means, get over yourself. It's a message board.
 
Upvote 0
Wow, that hit a nerve. I'm unimpressed with Utah as well, but I suppose we'll see if the top end of the Pac-10 actually shows up (unlike the rest of the conference, which has fallen flat on its face).

It didn't "hit a nerve" as much as it was a silly comment open to rebuttal and it was rebutted. :roll1:
 
Upvote 0
Sorry if you missed it, but you made a comment about a team being overseeded and I replied in kind. By all means, get over yourself. It's a message board.

Wrong, actually. I made a statement about #1 seeds in the past 30+ years. You responded with a statement about seeding in general. Reading is your friend. Well, in your case, evidently, it's your enemy.
 
Upvote 0
I'll be rooting for SFA but I don't like their chances vs ND. WVU is offensively-challenged, but ND is not. I don't see Cinderella making the Sweet 16, unfortunately.

Then again, I had Sparty in the title game, so...:lol:
 
Upvote 0
Wrong, actually. I made a statement about #1 seeds in the past 30+ years. You responded with a statement about seeding in general. Reading is your friend. Well, in your case, evidently, it's your enemy.
But who deserved a #1 seed over Oregon? That's the real question. I didn't think they were deserving after dismantling what I thought was an overrated Utah team. In actuality, Oregon is a very athletic team capable of giving any team fits.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top