The rule states the receiver must be blocked out of bounds. Grant Mason was in man-to-man coverage. He turned back to the ball. He did not block him out. I mean that's clear. The defender has a right to a position on the field. It's not a penalty. The ball comes back and they lose the down. That's not to say they're not going to hit a field goal or hit the next pass. I am not saying that's why we lost the game. I am just saying that was a big play. That's all I am saying."
Actually guys, I don't really have a problem with what he had to say. I love jumping all over Lllloyd for being a baby as much as the next guy, but I'm not so sure it's warranted here. He clearly states that he's NOT saying this is why they lost the game. He's just saying he didn't think Gonzo got forced out of bounds. Fine. I have no problem with that. His words seem to imply that he doubts his defense could have stopped OSU even if the play was reversed.
If this thread is mainly for making fun of Lllloyd, then fine. However, if we're really trying to take an unbiased look at what he said, then I think he's being fairly level-headed.
Just my two cents.