I'll have to mirror
@Bestbuck36's sentiment mostly (I won't compare him to Spielman though, my age prevents my qualifications there). I'm about positive the kid is going to be great at the next level and if it's for MSU, he is going to be a thorn in our side for 4 years. This is coming from the guy that always advocates "you can't take 'em all" in regards to Ohio players because simply put, there will be guys from Ohio that do well that we didn't offer. But Nick is right in our backyard, has incredible film, and backed it up in person at the combines against the nation's best. He is a great competitor and a technician that could contribute immediately here. We are well aware of him.
Although I LOVE Baker and see him in this class regardless, but I would take Conner over him and I will play along with this hypothetical...I just think he is much more of a sure thing. Conner is plenty athletic and plays well in coverage, which is Baker's strong suit. Conner is more of a pure LB and plays the position well...Baker's transition is a question mark. Conner has greater instincts at the position and any alleged deficiencies in athleticism are more than made up for with his early diagnosis of plays. I could go on, but hopefully the staff just wants him to camp and earn an offer...I really hope that is the case. All this being said, the last word I heard is that we would be happy with Baker and Hilliard but would take a 3rd if it was a guy at the top of the boards (i.e. SKL before he committed or Holland). However, I am still holding out hope that he camps with us and shows himself worthy of a spot.
Edit: Oh and Nick just won MVP of the LBs at the freaking 5-star challenge competing with all the best in the country...so yeah.