MililaniBuckeye;674672; said:You know what, you all are right and am I wrong, seeing I haven't seen Hawaii play at all and you all have seen every single Hawaii home game over the past fix years. Oh wait...
Michigan wasn't supposed to score 39 fucking points on us--on our field--but they did. And don't give me the "But we turned the ball over three times in our own territory" shit. Those 3 TOs resulted in 10 points...they scored the other 29 via a solid blend of rushing and passing. While Hawaii clearly relies more on passing, they do have a solid running attack behind a fucking bull of a tailback, Nate Ilaoa, who is 5'9", 260 with the agility and moves of a guy 40-50 pounds lighter...his season rush stats are 105-845 (8.2 ypc) and 12 TDs, and he also has 57 catches for 714 yards (12.5 ypc) and 5 TDs receiving out of the backfield. The Purdue game this past weekend was a great example. Whenever Purdue started playing the pass, Ilaoa would bust off runs of 8-12 yards...he absolutely trucked two defenders on one run. Also, Hawaii thrives on the very same crossing routes and deep middle routes that give us fits, and their two top WRs Bess and Rivers would be starting on all but a few teams in the country (Bess would be our #3 WR here behind Gonzo and Ginn). They are that good. Hell, Hawaii had 653 yards of offense on Purdue (434 passing, 219 rushing), which is far more than Purdue gave up to any other team this year. Their offensive scheme is the kind that would give us a serious challenge.
Mili,
I don't doubt that Hawaii is a talented team but please don't tell me that you're using the reasoning that you've seen a bunch of Hawaii games in person and on TV.
The same argument could be used against you in regards to many of us seeing OSU in person much more than you have.
BTW, what do you think a spread would be this year if OSU was to go out next week to Hawaii and play?
I'd say about 17.5.
Upvote
0