Well, the rest of the article was pretty glowing for tOSU, even coming off a visit to UF. I guess I just don't understand why some people always try to find any little negative (real or percieved) in articles.BigJim;1548871; said:How about the fact that he said he was now going to hold off naming a leader, where up until this point OSU was the clear leader. It doesn't get any more direct than that.
I would still bet on OSU at this point but after that article I would move the odds quite a bit. Something like 95% before hand and 70% now, IMO. That is not a "positive" for OSU.
Upvote
0