MaxBuck
SoCal, Baby!
If a kid is told that he is being paid by a legitimate charity for a job he is to do, that players in previous years have done, and that the activity has been cleared for a number of years in the past -- then I can understand the kid thinking he's doing nothing wrong.Gatorubet;1989004; said:If a booster or somebody associated with a booster gives anyone in either of our programs a few hundred in cash and the player does not suspect that it might be improper, then we both [strike]deserve the death penalty[/strike] have problems.
The outside world can see a person as a "booster" that the kid may see only as a representative of a non-profit organization that is trying to raise funds for cancer survivors or cancer research, which seems to be the case here. The problem is that the NCAA sees many activities as "okay" that to the objective observer would see as questionable, and other activities as "impermissible" to which the objective observer would say "what the fuck?" Again, this overweening obsession with "amateurism" creates many false indicators of "corruption" that unfairly tar young men.
Upvote
0