The Bucks did not have one impact play from the DL all night; and only one last week (the Kudla sack). If your DL can't make impact plays, then you're simply putting too much pressure on the back 7 or 8 (in the nickel). Look back to 2002, and all of the impact plays from Smith, Scott, Anderson, Peterson, even David Thompson. The DL has to step up, or the Bucks overall defense will suffer.Cicero said:I have to respectfully disagree on all counts. Yes, we gave up some yards, but against that type of offense any defense will give up a lot of yards. Our defensive line did a great job occupying blockers so our linebackers could roam freely, we got key turn overs that nearly changed the outcome of the game, and other than the first two drives contained and beat the crap out of the most dangerous QB in college football.
Our DL should be invisible if they are doing their jobs, our defensive system relies on the DL to occupy blockers so our line backers can make plays. Yes, there were some blown coverages on the running backs, but for the most part our linebackers were able to play sideline to sideline because Texas was forced to stay in and block our line. If you cannot get blockers to the second level the DL has done a fine job.
Upvote
0