lvbuckeye
Silver Surfer
umm... i guess that perception is reality, but in '02 Ohio State scored 45, 23, 50, 45, 19, 51 points respectively in the first six games of the season... they were much better of O than you seem to think... granted, when we lost MoC, the O struggled, but we only scored less than 13 points one time that year, so to say we averaged 'like 12' is ignorant at best, and borderline flaming...UTcain said:Understood, and coaching is a big part of it...but it's been known for years now, chemistry of the team is a huge part of success. I'm going to say this and i'm sure y'all are going to hate me for it, but the year that OSU won the national championship (02, right?)..they didn't have the MOST talented team of everyone out there. Krenzel and company only averaged like 12 points a game, but any time they needed that one play, or that one stop...any time they needed anything, they pulled together and got it done. As much as people point to coaching, that's just the players coming together and refusing to lose and trusting the person next to them. I personally believe Mack isn't as great a coach as others out there, but I still think he's a great coach who is getting the job done. Any one who complains about 4 straight 10 win seasons is crazy
as for the rest of the post, the Seniors this year were Frosh in '02 and know what it takes to win it all... they are focused and hungry... by contrast, the Seniors at UT know what it takes to lose to your rival every year (twice by 40+ points) and never win shit... which experience do you think is more valuable?
Last edited:
Upvote
0