• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread Game Two: Texas 25, Ohio State 22 (final)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Buckeyeskickbuttocks said:
21 - correct me if I'm wrong, but "contain" is something DE's do.
It depends...usually yes, DE's are associated with contain in the 4-3, but a variety of stunts can change responsiblities.

I don't see contain as the issue....I worry about the undisciplined pass rushing lanes we were seeing at the beginning of last year. When you let a mobile QB escape vertically into space...you are in deep shtuff...
 
Upvote 0
21 - correct me if I'm wrong, but "contain" is something DE's do.
Contain is responsibility that in a base defense against a drop back passer is the DE's responsibility but like anything on defense all this changes depending on stunts, blitzes, coverages and the offensive play call. For instance on a counter play the DE might be asked to take on the pulling linemen and then the responsiblity of contain would shift to either a saftey or LB with the other "filling" which basically means, making the tackle. on a bootleg or sprint out many teams will have the LB contain. This all depends on your personell, scheme, and opponent.

I don't see contain as the issue....I worry about the undisciplined pass rushing lanes we were seeing at the beginning of last year. When you let a mobile QB escape vertically into space...you are in deep shtuff...
Kinda nitpicking here but disciplined pass rushing lanes is a part of containing. If keeping a qb in the pocket is your goal then your DT's cannot be freelanceing and going around or cutting under blocks otherwise as you said he will escape vertically.
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow said:
Ask VY to beat you through the air. Take away the deep ball, and try and make him beat you with 8-10 yard completions.
Those are the passes that Vince could complete last year. He couldn't throw the ball deep or over the middle on slants. I think you should let him have the deep ball until he shows you that he can actually throw it with accuracy.
 
Upvote 0
texasfight06 said:
Those are the passes that Vince could complete last year. He couldn't throw the ball deep or over the middle on slants. I think you should let him have the deep ball until he shows you that he can actually throw it with accuracy.
Well you are definitely intitled to you opinion but, Vince disagrees with you, Mack disagrees with you, most scouts disagree with you, and though its not even worth the band width it takes up, it is my opinion that your wrong as well. Vince has had a problem with short routes since highschool with his tendency to guide throws instead of just passing, this was the first thing that he said he needed to work on after the rose bowl. Well, he actually said he needs to work on short passing game and cutting out early turnovers.
 
Upvote 0
Good call, I had been hearing from texas fans that his good ball was the deep one. However, I like Youboty going up for a deep ball anyday of the week. If he can stop edwards, he can certainly stop whoever Texas sends deep.
 
Upvote 0
High Lonesome said:
Kinda nitpicking here but disciplined pass rushing lanes is a part of containing. If keeping a qb in the pocket is your goal then your DT's cannot be freelanceing and going around or cutting under blocks otherwise as you said he will escape vertically.
I'll also nitpick and disagree with your assessment...although the lanes are a component of stopping Young...the term "contain" refers to not letting someone outside to reach the edge and get downhill.

I agree that all components must be there to "contain" as in stop or limit VY, but the "contain" in this instance refers to the outside contain.
 
Upvote 0
High Lonesome said:
Well you are definitely intitled to you opinion but, Vince disagrees with you, Mack disagrees with you, most scouts disagree with you, and though its not even worth the band width it takes up, it is my opinion that your wrong as well. Vince has had a problem with short routes since highschool with his tendency to guide throws instead of just passing, this was the first thing that he said he needed to work on after the rose bowl. Well, he actually said he needs to work on short passing game and cutting out early turnovers.
what deep pass routes did you think he was accurate on last year?
 
Upvote 0
Well I can think of more than a few that he hit David Thomas on over the middle,

Specifically - Tony Jefferies to Win the Kansas game was put in the only place that it could have,

Deep out to David Thomas in the Rose Bowl to convert a first down

and basically any deep pass that he threw on a roll out(most of these came after ou)

osugrad21 said:
I'll also nitpick and disagree with your assessment...although the lanes are a component of stopping Young...the term "contain" refers to not letting someone outside to reach the edge and get downhill.

I agree that all components must be there to "contain" as in stop or limit VY, but the "contain" in this instance refers to the outside contain.
ok, I will admit to not reading the original post that started all of this, so if we are refering to outside contain then i submit that you are correct.
 
Upvote 0
First of all, here's a texas teaser video to help hold us over till the 10th. It's great stuff, show Vphris some love over there.
http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14838

One element of his assessment (see the last few posts in that thread) is spot on. VY threw a lot of passes where his WR caught it, but a more alert DB could have turned and made a play on the ball. Sometimes just to knock it down, other times to go the opposite way. And these weren't timing routes that could be blamed on the WR, these were mostly passes where they were streaking down the field or to the sideline.

Has he gotten over the "nope I'm not quite sacked, I'm gonna spin around and throw it still" approach that is frequently visible in both his 2003 and 2004 highlight reel by jcdenton? Just looks like a fumble waiting to happen with how he holds that ball... To clarify for those who haven't seen it a defender wraps him up but doesn't take him down, so he spins around and then passes (I saw this multiple times). Maybe he only does this against lesser teams, but if he tries that against us he runs a huge risk of getting blindsided by one of our big uglies (that includes LBs) and losing the ball, or getting the ball/arm tipped as he throws it.
 
Upvote 0
High Lonesome said:
Deep out to David Thomas in the Rose Bowl to convert a first down
Like a ten yard out? I dont remember it exactly right now. But he had a lot of success on short dumps to Thomas and Scafie and horribly over and under threw on several deep attempts. I think that part of the reason that his completion % is so high, is because of the several short routes that he has completed. You can do this though when people keep their LBs keyed on the QB and release the TE for a quick out.

Not trying to cross hairs, but I have never been impressed with Vince's deep ball, especially when he tried to come overhand. I am hoping that changes this year.
 
Upvote 0
Just looks like a fumble waiting to happen with how he holds that ball...

So true, I was holding my breath for much of the season, but i actually made this comment last night to my roomate after watching the jcdenton video again. Towards the end he is actually tucking the ball and man that made me feel good, I hope he keeps it up. Some of the "spin and throw" stuff is what makes vince, vince so i would not want to take to much of it away from him, at the same time he can't try to do it every time is about to be sacked
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks said:
Regarding Spys...


If it works in the NFL, I'll take my chances against Mack Brown's club.

And some more quotes:
.....
"[Patriots coach Bill] Belichick usually likes to get a spy guy on me and put him in the middle," Flutie says.
.....

I don't think you spy VY every down, but I do think you gotta mix some in to make him think about it.

....
Here's another "spy story":

http://http://www.sptimes.com/2002/12/09/Bucs/Bucs_give_Vick_nowher.shtml

The Bucs insist they did nothing special. They simply played their regular defense. They say they didn't bring their safeties up any more than usual. And they didn't assign a player to spy on Vick.

"That's an insult," defensive tackle Anthony McFarland said. "We don't believe in spies. We just let the front four do what they do. It was our job to keep him in the pocket and then get him down." One thing made the Bucs' plan work to perfection: speed

Speed, that sounds familiar.



Spying a QB (for the whole game) is basically admitting that your defense can't complete it's assignments on any given play. I agree with BKB- I don't have a problem with spying him a couple times, but only to show him another look. Our defense is perfectly capable of containing him and putting him on the ground if he decides to run. I think he'll probably make 1 or 2 runs of about 20 yards, because he's so gifted athletically- but I don't see him running roughshod over us....unless we try to spy him the whole game.
 
Upvote 0
Re: Contain - the only reason I brought it up at all is because on the preceeding page it appeared to me that people were talking about LB's as if they'd be responsible for contain, and my understanding was that in a 4-3 (which is what OSU plays primarily) the DEs are primarily responsible for contain (Outside contain) I'm not Defensive guru, though, so I wanted to make sure I was correct in that understanding is all.

Findley - nice find. I wonder how much of that is "tough guy" talk. In any case, we're on the same page. I was posting all that other stuff cause the idea of spying was getting beat up and I thought unfairly so.
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow said:
First of all, here's a texas teaser video to help hold us over till the 10th. It's great stuff, show Vphris some love over there.
http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14838

One element of his assessment (see the last few posts in that thread) is spot on. VY threw a lot of passes where his WR caught it, but a more alert DB could have turned and made a play on the ball. Sometimes just to knock it down, other times to go the opposite way. And these weren't timing routes that could be blamed on the WR, these were mostly passes where they were streaking down the field or to the sideline.

Has he gotten over the "nope I'm not quite sacked, I'm gonna spin around and throw it still" approach that is frequently visible in both his 2003 and 2004 highlight reel by jcdenton? Just looks like a fumble waiting to happen with how he holds that ball... To clarify for those who haven't seen it a defender wraps him up but doesn't take him down, so he spins around and then passes (I saw this multiple times). Maybe he only does this against lesser teams, but if he tries that against us he runs a huge risk of getting blindsided by one of our big uglies (that includes LBs) and losing the ball, or getting the ball/arm tipped as he throws it.
I think all Texas fans are hoping he protects the ball alot better this year. Many times last year I remember grimacing after Young carelessly lost the ball trying to make something happen out of nothing. I believe the kid has really matured in the passing game, and he showed alot of that maturity in the Rose Bowl. I also agree that Young throws a better deep ball than short passing game. Several times last year he struggled throwing the touch pass and many times the deep balls were pretty accurate. I am by no means implying that he throws a very accurate deep ball, but he has more success with the longer routes. Hopefully he will improve hitting his receiver in stride on both long and short routes.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top