• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread Game Two: #1 Ohio State 24, #2 Texas 7 (9/9/06)

Star ratings mean shit.
Just ask M*ch*g*n.

I'll start with the easy one. Brandon Mitchell = Matt Melton, A 5th year backup who would never break a lineup with decent starters
At the other safety Nick Patterson = Ishie Oduegwu, bith promising sophs.
We don't have any walkon corners on our depth chart but I'll be generous a say Antonio Smith = Erick Jackson
For a promising sophomore corner I'll go with Malcolm Jenkins = Ryan Palmer
We don't have any transfers from Baylor at linebacker so I'll be nice and say John Kerr = Scott Derry
At MLB I'll go with James Laurinaitas = Jeremy Campbell
And last but not least I'll be real generous Marcus Freeman = Robert Killebrew (last year), they were rated about the same.
I wish I could oversimplify everything like this. Your life must be spent in completely oblivious bliss. You are truly amazing.
I took you off "ignore" just to see what gems you would come up with these last 10 days or so, thanks for not letting me down.:slappy:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
hilarious stuff xray... I'd imagine this prediction will pan out about as well as your nfl projections.

Now, now...let's be fair to xraypansy. He was only referring to the defense in that post. He said we had one projected first-rounder, and we only had three defenders taken in the top 18 picks. He wasn't that far off. :slappy:
 
Upvote 0
Randy, and I will say this as nicely as possible, you are a complete jackass. Recruiting is an inexact science. Star ratings mean dick once you get on campus. A.J. Hawk is a perfect example. He was the third rated LB in our 02 class. He was only a 3-star recruit. Mike D'Andrea (5-stars)and Bobby Carpenter (4-stars) were both rated higher. In fact, Rivals had 29 other outside LBers rated above AJ. Can't miss guys like Marvin Byrdsong and Michael Williams (sound familiar?). You are going to have to do better than looking at star ratings.

Since you mentioned Rivals, A.J. was actually tOSU's 4th highest LB recruit in the class of 2002. Stan White, Jr. was a 4-start LB recruit in Rivals (Scout listed him as a TE). :wink2:
 
Upvote 0
Since you mentioned Rivals, A.J. was actually tOSU's 4th highest LB recruit in the class of 2002. Stan White, Jr. was a 4-start LB recruit in Rivals (Scout listed him as a TE). :wink2:

Thanks for the correction. I felt like there was someone missing.

Also, Texas and Ohio State are two of the eight schools to have all of their recruits qualify this year. How bout that?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
No, you were being much more ignorant than you realized.

A.J.Hawk = 3*
Santonio Holmes = 3*
Nick Mangold = 1*
Youboty = 3*

All the above except Youboty were first round picks (Youboty was third round). Star ratings mean shit.

I agree the star system is an imperfect science. Some Texas notables...

Michael Huff = 3* (Thorpe award winner and 1st round draft pick)
Rashad Bobino = 2* (current starter)
Vincent Young = 5* (shoulda been 10* ;-])
 
Upvote 0
Inexact yes...meaningless no

That wouldn't be very convenient for xray's arguments.:wink2:

Don't you think you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater?

While you miss on some that can't miss, and hit on those that no one has heard of I think the rating are becoming more and more accurate over time. Most of the highest rated recruiting class on the star system are the best teams. There are exceptions, but in general I believe that is true. Don't you?

Hook'em
 
Upvote 0
Don't you think you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater?

While you miss on some that can't miss, and hit on those that no one has heard of I think the rating are becoming more and more accurate over time. Most of the highest rated recruiting class on the star system are the best teams. There are exceptions, but in general I believe that is true. Don't you?

Hook'em

about as accurate as heisman winners are successful in the nfl...
 
Upvote 0
Don't you think you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater?

While you miss on some that can't miss, and hit on those that no one has heard of I think the rating are becoming more and more accurate over time. Most of the highest rated recruiting class on the star system are the best teams. There are exceptions, but in general I believe that is true. Don't you?

Hook'em

I would say there is no science to it at all.
I would say there are organizations out there profiteering off of the talents of High School kids, and to make more profit they have to come up with some sort of way to evaluate one kid against another.
I would say that there is more to a football player than his 40 time
I would say that a lot of "recruiting gurus" know how to break down film as well as my 4 year old son
I would say that there are some people that they get right because even a blind squirrel finds a nut.
I would say, also, that star ratings change quite frequently and often have to do more with who commits early than any real talent evaluation.
I would say, pound for pound, star ratings are complete rubbish.

Anyone could look at VY and know the kid could play. It takes a well seasoned coach to look at a player like Hawk and see that HE can play too. I'm not saying Mack can't find the diamond in the rough, don't get me wrong, just picking some examples off the top of my head.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top