Pittman, Billy 5 130 1 63
I'm not a fan of the thinking "take away Pittmans long and he wasn't that great" but, Ill note it anyway. I mean, yes, Pittman did outgain Holmes and Ginn, and it begs the question, why didn't Holmes or Ginn have the 63 yarder if they're so good?
But,
Holmes, S 4 73 1 36
And, removing the one big play (the biggest gain of the game, I might add)
Pittman, Billy 4 63 1 63
Comparable.
Again... I'm not saying Pittman's actual numbers should be discounted. Just saying the "big play" can happen at any time,.. it happend for Pittman, and didn't for Holmes... If Holmes caught 1 more ball, maybe it goes for 60 yards... Doesn't change the fact that he didn't.. of course... but it's not unusal to take the "outliers" out of a statistical comparison.. and the 63 yarder that Pittman got is clearly "unusual" in comparison to the rest of the numbers under consideration.