• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

ESPN (A bunch of Death-Spiraling maroons)

Scathing.

http://www.oregonlive.com/sports/or...f/2011/12/canzano_at_espn_money_talks_jo.html

Canzano: At ESPN, money talks, journalism walks

John Canzano, The Oregonian By John Canzano, The Oregonian

...The events' broadcast rights were previously shared by Fox and ABC. Never felt heavy-handed when they were in charge. And as part of ESPN's exclusive deal, the personalities associated with the cable network get to hang out at practice, tweeting about the Ducks' practice music selection as Erin Andrews did this week. They're buying exclusive access to players and coaches before the bowls and exclusive rights during the games. Also, Herbstreit's cute children will apparently get access that a long line of trained journalists who cover the teams for readers and viewers on a daily basis do not.

Money talks. And journalism walks, see?

Sick stuff.

Not just because ESPN gets access to footage that it will package and feed to viewers like it did with that flimsy, but wildly profitable, LeBron James one-hour ESPN-televised infomercial special two summers ago. But because the agreement between cable network and bowl series has to make you wonder where the relationship between ESPN and the football it pretends to cover begins and ends. Are they partners? Is this a legitimate subject-reporter situation? Once ESPN buys access to an event don't they then turn from journalist to promoter?

Don't answer.

Everyone already knows...
 
Upvote 0
jlb1705;2075096; said:
Scathing.

Surprisingly more scathing than ESPN's own Ombudsman (currently Poynter Review, in addition to the ones before them).

I like the fact that ESPN won't even grant interviews to their own Ombudsman with certain ESPN employees too (real transparent there).
 
Upvote 0
Look. Make no mistake. Anyone paying attention to the exodus of talented, well-sourced journalists from ESPN to other places in the last decade understands that a lot of the best talent on staff bolted long ago to places like Yahoo!, Fox Sports, CBS Sports and Sports Illustrated. Places that are still interested in more than air-brush journalism. The four-letter sports network has gravitated away from great reporting, and writing, and substance, and instead is in the business of buying up events and exclusivity and passing it off to the consumer as journalism.

That sums it up in an nutshell. Those with integrity and an interest in real journalism saw the writing on the wall and bolted. What's left are blow dried hucksters and vapid entertainment acts: Herbstreit, Corso, Holtz & May, Craig James, Erin Andrews & Michelle Beadle (I'd still do 'em both) et al.
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye;2075102; said:
That sums it up in an nutshell. Those with integrity and an interest in real journalism saw the writing on the wall and bolted. What's left are blow dried hucksters and vapid entertainment acts:

The one flaw in your argument:

keith-olbermann-fired.jpg
 
Upvote 0
I'm watching the end of the Purdue game and before the last two time outs the lead in to the OSU vs. Indiana game were as follows:

Zeller has scored 10+ points in x consecutive gamess
Mr. Such and Such (not sure what his name is) 1000+ career scorer


no mention of any OSU players.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top