• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Disgraced Former Penn State DC Jerry Sandusky (convicted child molester)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
"If the Fruit of the Looms don't fit you must acquit!" It only takes one dissenting vote.
But those hand written love letters and video interview with Costas are pretty damning.
And his lawyer isn't exactly Johnny Cochran.
 
Upvote 0
Some more.
http://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=36&tid=155893824&mid=155893824&sid=890&style=2


Re: reason for Matt Sandusky coming forward?Reply

Maybe. Or, given what we've learned about his behavior in general, it could just fit with his sporadic patterns. Lastly, the one other reason is "ka-ching".
It's a terrible thing to say, but I find myself not believing him. He's got too much mental/emotional baggage, he's already testified forcefully that there was no abuse, and he wasn't part of the prosecution. I just don't buy this. I realize that I will get excoriated for this, but to me this one is just common sense.

(How many minutes before a posting comes here telling me I am an enabler?)
Click to expand...

It is funny how people see the same thing differently.Reply

My mind immediately went to the missing qualifier "sexual." He was abused but not sexually? Is that what it means, or were they just being general to sort of protect what little privacyu he may have left?
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
Posted: Yesterday*8:14*AM
RE: Maybe the ESPN boycott worked?*
Didn't work at all. They just don't care any more because, as said many times already in this thread, they got the biggest fish they wanted 7 months ago.* Let's be honest - if Sandusky had done this as a long time assistant at Lock Haven, it wouldn't have garnered even back page news.

This story all along to the media has never been about Jerry Sandusky - it's been about Penn State and Penn State football - and in the beginning they had the frenzy of going after the biggest fish in CFB.*

Even today, whenever they report on it, that's why you constantly see the POS's picture and a Nittany Lion emblem under him.** Even tho this trial as it happens right here, right now, has absolutely nothing to do with Penn State.*

If they expose a cover-up by Spanier and the higher ups?* Watch out, it'll be November 2011 all over again.
Penn State - 7-time National Champions.
Last edited Yesterday*8:21*AM by mjb34500
Click to expand...

Uh, biggest fish in CFB? Short bus, mutant pig, cults, man!

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=157&f=1395&t=9088387
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Re: Did anyone catch the instructions of the judge to the jurors?Reply
As a scientist, I need physical evidence to convict someone -- DNA, fibers, fingerprints, video, audio, photographs. Although some of the alleged victims sounded convincing, evidence is still lacking. How can one conclude that Sandusky is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?
Click to expand...

By that logic, 18 eye witnesses testifying to something wouldn't be enough to convict. JFC, these people are simply fucking brilliant.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top