Diet-Fitness-General Wellness Your Thoughts?

[Buckeneye]

I understand that. I was just curious as to your usage of:

Turkey Bacon? (I hope)
Skim milk?
Lean proteins...

Turkey Bacon has a much lower saturated fat % and sodium content then normal bacon.

Skim milk over anything else because a 12oz glass of 2% or Vit. D has as much saturated fat as a small mcdonalds fry.

Lean proteins (chicken, fish, turkey) because the protein/calorie ratio is way higher in favor of protein then it would be with say...steak. (yes even lean steak) It's a proven much healthier way of approaching weight gain then say the "old school" way of just bulk foods, fats, "steaks & shakes" method.

 

[muffler dragon]

I see where we differ clearly: I'm a fan of saturated fats.

 

[Buckeneye]

I see where we differ clearly: I'm a fan of saturated fats.

I am too. But in a smart capacity.

 

[muffler dragon]

I am too. But in a smart capacity.

"Smart capacity"? I'm not sure if that's an inside dig at the conversation, me, or some other point; therefore, I'll just say that I am well aware of the demonization by CW with regards to saturated fats, and I'm not inclined to find a whole lot of substantiation to that POV. If you hold to that perspective, then I'll just agree to disagree.

 

[Buckeneye]

"Smart capacity"? I'm not sure if that's an inside dig at the conversation, me, or some other point; therefore, I'll just say that I am well aware of the demonization by CW with regards to saturated fats, and I'm not inclined to find a whole lot of substantiation to that POV. If you hold to that perspective, then I'll just agree to disagree.

Not a dig at all. As the saying goes "time and a place for everything"...

And it isn't so much a "demonization" as a mere fact, American's on the 'general' consume too many saturated and trans fats.

 

[muffler dragon]

Not a dig at all. As the saying goes "time and a place for everything"...

Alrighty.

And it isn't so much a "demonization" as a mere fact, American's on the 'general' consume too many saturated and trans fats.

I emboldened the "and", because it's out of place in how I view the two types of fats. There aren't correlations between what trans fats do/become and saturated fats.

As for the time and place of saturated fats, personally, I find that it's difficult to consume too many animal fats. There's a limit that my body will handle before getting upset. I don't take it that far, but I'm just saying that the amount that was in GeorgiaBuck's post does not infer an over-consuming amount of saturated fat. In fact, three eggs, three pieces of regular bacon, regular vitamin D milk, and good ol' animal meats with their standard amount of fats wouldn't be a problem when consumed throughout an entire day on a regular basis. I would go so far as to say that his appetitie is probably properly sated to the point that the snacks may be superfluous.

 

[IronBuckI]

I see where we differ clearly: I'm a fan of saturated fats.

I am too. But in a smart capacity.

"Smart capacity"? I'm not sure if that's an inside dig at the conversation, me, or some other point; therefore, I'll just say that I am well aware of the demonization by CW with regards to saturated fats, and I'm not inclined to find a whole lot of substantiation to that POV. If you hold to that perspective, then I'll just agree to disagree.

I didn't see it as a dig at all, but more of a differing definition of the word "fan". Buckeneye is a "fan" of the taste of foods that contain saturated fat, but thinks that they're bad for you, and should only be consumed in minimal or "smart" quantities. You believe that they're actually good for you, and that they have been demonized.

You two clearly don't subscribe to the same views on fats, but I didn't think there was a dig intended.

 

[Buckeneye]

Alrighty.





As for the time and place of saturated fats, personally, I find that it's difficult to consume too many animal fats. There's a limit that my body will handle before getting upset. I don't take it that far, but I'm just saying that the amount that was in GeorgiaBuck's post does not infer an over-consuming amount of saturated fat. .

What alarmed me more then anything was the presence of bacon and not having any listed complex carbs in the morning. The absolute best time to eat them. The rest after that I probably shouldn't have bothered. But it is what it is.

 

[muffler dragon]

What alarmed me more then anything was the presence of bacon and not having any listed complex carbs in the morning. The absolute best time to eat them. The rest after that I probably shouldn't have bothered. But it is what it is.

Got'cha.

I didn't even think about it, but hell... I don't even eat breakfast. So... to each their own.

 

[Bucknut24]

fitness gruru's i call to you one more time...

this is the workout my friend has me doin

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/beginner-to-advanced-bodybuilder-in-12-weeks-phase-1.html?page=1

which seems like the decent workout, but the issue with me is...im still looking to lose A LOT of weight (im currently 270) and want to get down eventually to the 220's. Now I feel like I should focus more on cardio than weights (still need to do weights obviously) this plan seems to be more people who are looking to bulk up rather than cut no?

 

[Buckeneye]

Burning weight revolves around the biggest thing. Caloric intake vs caloric burn. How you choose to accomplish this is entirely up to you.

No offense, I'm not going to look it up. Could you bullet point the details??Then I can give further input.

 

[Buckeye513]

I agree with md about saturated fats. The only issues with bacon are the additives, which aren't a problem if you find a good uncured brand.

I also disagree about fruit in the morning and the need to eat complex carbs. Your body only breaks down sugar differently in the morning in that it's less likely to be stored as adipose tissue.

 

[Bucknut24]

just realized it didn't link....added the hyperlink

 

[Buckeneye]

Every body is different. You need to find what workout yours responds to best.

As for the link...?
That's just a basic guideline. It's a solid full body workout or circuit workout.
That's a very generalized plan. It'll be fine for simply losing weight.

It lacks certain specifics. Like targeting your full core, lower back, traps and the full shoulder workout.
(do not say forearms, if you use proper form its almost an unnecessary muscle to target)

But it should suffice for something just to burn calories and see results.

edit: 2-3 minutes between sets seems a bit long. Especially if you're not doing higher weights.

 

[GeorgiaBuck2]

fitness gruru's i call to you one more time...

this is the workout my friend has me doin

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/beginner-to-advanced-bodybuilder-in-12-weeks-phase-1.html?page=1

which seems like the decent workout, but the issue with me is...im still looking to lose A LOT of weight (im currently 270) and want to get down eventually to the 220's. Now I feel like I should focus more on cardio than weights (still need to do weights obviously) this plan seems to be more people who are looking to bulk up rather than cut no?

P90x is what I started out with. It teaches good form and it is a rather intense plan. You can find the videos for free on Youku, the Chinese version of Youtube. This is also a great plan if you don't want to fork over the money for a gym membership.