billmac91
Head Coach
3074326;1637419; said:Gibson a better prospect, Gholston a higher ceiling (maybe)
But from what we've seen of Vern, he isn't coming close to that ceiling.
They're just a bad comparison. Much different players. Vernon was a bull-rusher with excellent straight line speed in a 265 pound maxed out frame. Vernon's biggest weakness was lateral movement and changing direction.
Thaddeus is much better laterally, has the same straight line speed, but is less explosive at the LOS. Vernon can't reach his ceiling b/c he's playing the wrong position....OLB. And if you try and move him to DE, he's an awful fit in the 3-4 at 265 as a hole plugger.
As much fun as it was to watch Thaddeus get to the QB, his most jaw-dropping plays to me were chasing down RB's 7 yards upfield, or diagnosing a quick hitting play, and chasing down the receiver in the middle of the field or out on a bubble screen.
From anyone's recollection....who looked more comfortable when dropping into to coverage as a Buckeye? Vernon or Thaddeus? It's Thaddeus by a longshot.
Again, I just hope Vernon makes a wise move come free agency, and picks a team that wants an edge rusher in a 4-3 scheme. I said it earlier, but unfortunately the worst thing Vernon did for his career to this point was running a blistering 4.6 40 at 265 pounds giving everyone (including myself) the notion that he was fast enough to be a LB in the NFL. While Vern may be fast enough, he isn't nearly agile or laterally capable of it. He needs to line up at DE in a 4-3 and play off his instincts.
I think Thaddeus closely resembles Lawrence Timmons of Pittsburgh who is 6'1 and 235. Timmons has gotten better every year in Pittsburgh after playing DE at Florida State. I think Gibson has a higher ceiling and better measurables. Thad is going to make some team very happy for the distant future...
Last edited:
Upvote
0