I don’t know if Jeff Halfley was just a fucking savant or if Chase Young was a cheat code,
While Chase is one of the very best pass rushers to have played since Myles left A&M, don't sell the rest of the defense short.
You had two 1st round corners, under-appreciated IDL in Hamilton who is carving out a very nice NFL career.
Another NFL IDL in Togiai (tweener at the pro level and my frustrations with him aside)
A LB Duo in Werner and Harrison that have grown into quality NFL starters.
Browning who was looking like the 2nd coming of Von Miller until injury.
And then the most overlooked player in Fuller who has also grown into a pretty good pro.
The defense was balanced front to back with no glaring weakness to consistently exploit along with talent AND experience. Which is what people are forgetting, the 2022 group can't claim that same status.
admitting to foundational errors such as using Sawyer for the Jack position (or now we hear-even having a Jack position).
That's why I ask, what is it you say you do here?
Answered your own question here. Attempting to indentify, coach and field a 2pt edge that can fill multiple roles isn't easy to do when you come in fresh as a year one DC. Heacock did it with Thad Gipson because he was well versed in his abilities. Same thing with the role that Bobby Carpenter would spot on occasion. Likewise for Gholston, Nathan Williams and..... I think those are the big(ger) names under his tenure here. Oh, can't leave it out Will Smith (RIP) either. Although he didn't 2pt rush and spot drop nearly as much.
So when a coach understands what his design calls for isn't conducive to the players strengths (Sawyer in this case) you either attempt to develop a new player for that role, or you reduce that role to what it will now be, a full time, 3pt weakside edge. Sadly there have been some serious growing pains at times and it sucks Sawyer wasn't able to fill the role to the extent the position entails. So we can keep fitting round pegs to square holes or adapt. It would appear, based on the limited information given, that Knowles has chosen the latter. Which I can appreciate given the stubbornness of a great many coaches throughout the years.
This isn't to absolve Knowles entirely, by no means. Only more to help cultivate an understanding.
I had to put up with ALOT of Browns coverage and outlets claiming they would be a top 10 defense this year. Then you had little ol' me highlighting just how and why that wasn't going to even come close to happening. What fans, including yourself and even myself to an extent, are victim to is the hype. Or more specifically, unjustified hype. Yes, Coach Knowles got a great dose of that before the season and twice more after the week 1 win against NoD when we put the clamps on a fairly pedestrian and under-developed early season offense.
Then as the season dragged on we understood the weaknesses in the secondary. Just like anything, if it's a weakness of personnel and experience in a game that boils down to violent chess, then It's damn near impossible to fix it in the course of half a season.
Were there execution errors by DB's? Yes. They need further experience and development.
Can and should Knowles be held accountable as the DC? Also yes. But this isn't like with Withers in 2013 where the 1st, 2nd and 3rd problems with the defense are the coach himself. At least you see someone who is naturally self-inflective and more than willing to seek the remedy to his own (mis) creations. Because of that, I feel strongly about another season under this current direction.
Where times I've (we as a Buckeye collective) have seen enough by week 7-8 several times in the past.
edit: Forgot to mention - the calls that were mostly the defenses strong suite all season - Cover 1, and certain zero looks, were also the calls that boned them the hardest when the lights were the brightest. So it becomes more of a 'damned if you do' type scenario at that point. Which, again without making excuses, tends to boil down to execution in the moment.