Iowa was 10-2 last year. Tennessee was 10-3. Of all the preseason rankings I have found, I have found Iowa ahead in half and Tenn ahead in half. How does that equate to saying Tennessee is tougher than Iowa? If you HAD to give an advantage, I'd say you give it to the team with the better record. I also cannot figure out how you are saying that Purdue will be a better team than Minnesota next year...Purdue won't play a tough schedule, but I would take Minny head to head given all the offensive talent Purdue lost and with Maroney & Wheelright returning. Also, even if PSU and Pitt have equal talent, playing AT Happy Valley is a heck of a lot more difficult than playing at Pitt. The rest are inconsequential and I won't bother arguing.
Notre Dame Ohio State
1) USC > Texas
2) Tennessee = Iowa
3) at Michigan = at Michigan
4) at Purdue < at Minnesota
5) at Pittsburgh < at Penn State
6) Michigan State = Michigan State
7) Syracuse < Northwestern
8) BYU < Miami (OH)
9) at Stanford > Illinois
10) at Washington > at Indiana
11) Navy > San Diego State
Using this schedule, it's even 4-4 with three of ND's advantages coming at the very bottom.
I wasn't arguing that Ohio State's scheduling is vastly superior to the Domers. I'm arguing that the exact same schedule that ND fans blame for their mediocre records is similar to the schedule that we play...with very different results.
When Ohio State loses...our fans blame OUR team, we don't whine about how good the other ones are. We EXPECT to win every game...no wonder Notre Dame has fallen so far.
bsubuck said:
Notre Dame Ohio State
1) USC > Texas
2) Tennessee > Iowa
3) at Michigan = at Michigan
4) at Purdue > at Minnesota
5) at Pittsburgh = at Penn State
6) Michigan State = Michigan State
7) Syracuse < Northwestern
8) BYU < Miami (OH)
9) at Stanford > Illinois
10) at Washington > at Indiana
11) Navy > San Diego State