I think that’s a reasonable feeling to have. And much of it I share. That said, I also think that it’s nearly impossible to manage / govern based on those kinds of feelings. The objective critieria laid out initially, flattening the curve to not overrun the health care capacity, seems to have been achieved for the most part. No question, in some geographies it may have been closer to capacity than we would have liked.
Using your criteria even, I think that what has been done, can be viewed largely as successful. With reopening, I’m sure that we all expected some level of uptick in cases. And if the processes are in place to manage a soft landing, albeit with a few bumps due to turbulence, it won’t be too bad. How policy is dictated as we see numbers come out will be interesting to watch. I do suspect that there will be pushback from a vocal minority but the vast majority will do their part.
But at the end of the day, those who are making decisions need objective criteria to work with. And while this hasn’t been comfortable for anyone, regardless of perspective on what those objectives should be, there’s a saying that rings true about the best compromises leaving both sides dissatisfied. There’s a part of me that is buying into that.