On Wednesday, the Columbus Blue Jackets made a surprising announcement: Veteran winger Vinny Prospal had signed a 1-year, $2.5 million contract extension that both took him off the trade market and signaled a commitment between player and franchise. How committed?
Aaron Portzline of Puck-Rakers reported that the deal included "a gentleman's agreement that when Prospal's playing days are over, he'll stay with the organization in some capacity."
This set off some alarm bells for eagle-eyed observers like
Larry Brooks of the NY Post and our radio buddy Jeff Marek (on today's "
Marek Vs. Wyshynski" podcast):
Was the promise of future work actually salary cap circumvention on the part of the Blue Jackets?
The NHL CBA addresses several types of circumvention, all leading back to the same theme: You can't compensate a player in any way that goes beyond the provisions of a standard player contract. Does the promise of post-retirement employment do that?
We asked NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly if a "gentleman's agreement" is technically circumvention.