• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
AuburnBuckeye;1492310; said:
I'm not really even that concerned about it happening to Auburn again. ( They got a mountain to climb before they're back in the picture) I just want to prevent it from happening to another team.
I know that, my point is I suspect the fact that it did happen to Auburn made it color your view of the post-season much more strongly than it would have had the exact same thing happened to, say, Nebraska.
 
Upvote 0
AuburnBuckeye;1492318; said:
What's wrong with upsets? They make sports exciting.

They do when they're meaningful - like USC's losses to UCLA, Stanford, and Oregon State the last 3 years.

Those upsets would mean a helluva lot less if USC ended up in a playoff at the end of the year. Especially to fans outside the Pac 10.
 
Upvote 0
AuburnBuckeye;1492179; said:
Exactley but it's not quite as bad, with the BCS a team can go undefeated and still not get their rightful shot at the title. But with this system the #9 team in the country will be on the outside looking in. Which team would you prefer be screwed over. An undefeated or one loss major or small conference team, or a 2-3 loss one?



If Ball St. would have gone undefeated last year the very well might not have been in the top 8, but do you seriously think they deserved a shot at the title? People look for some form of consistency from a team before they are taken seriously, last year was the first year Ball St. was impressive this decade.

They aren't creating gripes they are essentially transferring them. Would rather have a #3 or #4 team that was a few votes away from being a top 2 team get screwed or some #9-10 team that would be hard pressed to make a BCS bowl game get screwed? When it comes down to it someone will probably get screwed, I would just rather have it be a team barely scratching the top 10.


I have admitted NUMEROUS times that the playoff system isn't perfect, I just think it keeps some really really quality teams from getting boned.

I laugh at this...so the playoff system IS still a popularity contest. No thanks.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1492314; said:
They work fine?

Are you serious? Georgetown beat Villanova two out of three times in 1984-85. Villanova was an 8 seed, Georgetown was a clear Number 1, not just seed.. but number 1 in the nation....

that's not "working fine"

Then why even have a BCS title game if it is so obvious who the clear #1 team is every year in college football? Just crown a champion after the regular season is over.
 
Upvote 0
BB73;1492324; said:
They do when they're meaningful - like USC's losses to UCLA, Stanford, and Oregon State the last 3 years.

Those upsets would mean a helluva lot less if USC ended up in a playoff at the end of the year. Especially to fans outside the Pac 10,
Yes, but they would mean a lot if they happened in a playoff, which BKB seems to be against.
 
Upvote 0
AuburnBuckeye;1492328; said:
Yes, but they would mean a lot if they happened in a playoff, which BKB seems to be against.

How could there possibly be an upset of that magnitude (Stanford was about a 40-point underdog) in a playoff system with 8 teams?

Unless, that is, TSUN was in the playoffs and they included lower division teams like Appalachian State?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
DaddyBigBucks;1492339; said:
Wow - powerful argument for changing a system that isn't broken


BTW: Do you still believe that the pro-playoff crowd vastly outnumbers the anti-playoff crowd? If so, why are none (ok, maybe one) of your multitude coming to your defense?

A few days ago he guessed that the proponents had about a 5-1 majority. One of the TSUN fans chimed in that it was more like 25-1. He may be re-thinking that estimate.

AuburnBuckeye said:
Iit seems like people who are all for a playoff outnumber those who aren't like 5 to 1.

blueinfla;1490119; said:
It's probably closer to 25 to 1.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
zincfinger;1492320; said:
I know that, my point is I suspect the fact that it did happen to Auburn made it color your view of the post-season much more strongly than it would have had the exact same thing happened to, say, Nebraska.
It bothers me, and I don't like Auburn at all, other than when they gave us this gem:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viSJgjoqLFs]YouTube - Florida Fan Gets Upset After Florida Loss[/ame]
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1492337; said:
That'd be fine by me.
How could you choose fairly between the top-3 last year?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top